Leveraging ``chain-of-thought (CoT)'' reasoning to elicit rapid and precise responses from large language models (LLMs) is rapidly attracting research interest. A notable challenge here is how to design or select optimal prompts. The process of prompt selection relies on trial and error, involving continuous adjustments and combinations of input prompts by users based on the corresponding new responses generated from LLMs. Furthermore, minimal research has been conducted to explore how LLMs employ the mathematical problem-solving capabilities learned from user interactions to address issues in narrative writing. To improve interpretability and explore the balance principle between generality and personalization under a multi-domain CoT prompt selection scenario, we propose the Federated Logic rule learning approach (FedLogic). We introduce a theoretical formalization and interactive emulation of the multi-domain CoT prompt selection dilemma in the context of federated LLMs. We cast the problem of joint probability modeling as a bilevel program, where the CoT prompt selection intricacy can be likened to a fuzzy score-based rule selection with the LLMs function as rule generators. FedLogic solves this problem through variational expectation maximization (V-EM). In addition, we incorporate two KL-divergence constraints within this probabilistic modeling framework to surmount the intricacies of managing extensive search spaces and accomplishing cross-domain personalization of CoTs. To the best of our knowledge, FedLogic is the first interpretable and principled federated multi-domain CoT prompt selection approach for LLMs.