Recent advances in self-supervised learning and neural network scaling have enabled the creation of large models -- known as foundation models -- which can be easily adapted to a wide range of downstream tasks. The current paradigm for comparing foundation models involves benchmarking them with aggregate metrics on various curated datasets. Unfortunately, this method of model comparison is heavily dependent on the choice of metric, which makes it unsuitable for situations where the ideal metric is either not obvious or unavailable. In this work, we present a metric-free methodology for comparing foundation models via their embedding space geometry. Our methodology is grounded in random graph theory, and facilitates both pointwise and multi-model comparison. Further, we demonstrate how our framework can be used to induce a manifold of models equipped with a distance function that correlates strongly with several downstream metrics.