Sequence-to-sequence models have been used to transform erroneous programs into correct ones when trained with a large enough dataset. Some recent studies also demonstrated strong empirical evidence that code review (natural language instruction about suggestive changes in code) can improve the program repair further. Large language models, trained with Natural Language (NL) and computer program corpora, have the capacity to contain inherent knowledge of both. In this study, we investigate if this inherent knowledge of code and NL can be utilized to improve automated program repair. We applied PLBART and CodeT5, two state-of-the-art language models that are pre-trained with both Programming Language (PL) and Natural Language (NL), on two such natural language-based program repair datasets and found that the pre-trained language models fine-tuned with datasets containing both code review and subsequent code changes notably outperform each of the previous models. We observed that the pre-trained models improve the previously best-reported results by 9.91% on the Review4Repair dataset and by 24.72% on the dataset by Tufano et al. This suggests that a pre-trained sequential model has a better understanding of natural language and can utilize it much better. We performed an ablation study to assess the contribution of the pre-training mechanism and the model architecture. We found that pre-training was significantly more important in the performance gain than the model architecture. The practical application of using pre-trained transformer models in the context of automated program repair is still a long way off. However, our study demonstrates the substantial value of employing pre-trained models, paving the path for future studies to use more of these.