Given a command, humans can directly execute the action after thinking or choose to reject it, with reasonable feedback at the same time. However, the behavior of existing text-to-image generation methods are uncontrollable and irresponsible. In this paper, we construct extensive experiments to verify whether they can be accountable (say no and explain why) for those prohibited instructions. To this end, we define a novel text-based visual re-creation task and construct new synthetic CLEVR-NOT dataset (620K) and manually pictured Fruit-NOT dataset (50K). In our method, one text-image pair as the query is fed into the machine, and the model gives a yes or no answer after visual and textual reasoning. If the answer is yes, the image auto-encoder and auto-regressive transformer must complete the visual re-creation under the premise of ensuring image quality, otherwise the system needs to explain why the commands cannot be completed or prohibited. We provide a detailed analysis of experimental results in image quality, answer accuracy, and model behavior in the face of uncertainty and imperfect user queries. Our results demonstrate the difficulty of a single model for both textual and visual reasoning. We also hope our explorations and findings can bring valuable insights about the accountability of text-based image generation models. Code and datasets can be found at https://matrix-alpha.github.io.