In this paper, we study the tradeoffs between time-speedup and the number of communication rounds of the learning process in the collaborative learning model on non-IID data, where multiple agents interact with possibly different environments and they want to learn an objective in the aggregated environment. We use a basic problem in bandit theory called best arm identification in multi-armed bandits as a vehicle to deliver the following conceptual message: Collaborative learning on non-IID data is provably more difficult than that on IID data. In particular, we show the following: a) The speedup in the non-IID data setting can be less than $1$ (that is, a slowdown). When the number of rounds $R = O(1)$, we will need at least a polynomial number of agents (in terms of the number of arms) to achieve a speedup greater than $1$. This is in sharp contrast with the IID data setting, in which the speedup is always at least $1$ when $R \ge 2$ regardless of number of agents. b) Adaptivity in the learning process cannot help much in the non-IID data setting. This is in sharp contrast with the IID data setting, in which to achieve the same speedup, the best non-adaptive algorithm requires a significantly larger number of rounds than the best adaptive algorithm. In the technique space, we have further developed the generalized round elimination technique introduced in arXiv:1904.03293. We show that implicit representations of distribution classes can be very useful when working with complex hard input distributions and proving lower bounds directly for adaptive algorithms.