Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) adapts a model trained on one domain to a novel domain using only unlabeled data. So many studies have been conducted, especially for semantic segmentation due to its high annotation cost. The existing studies stick to the basic assumption that no labeled sample is available for the new domain. However, this assumption has several issues. First, it is pretty unrealistic, considering the standard practice of ML to confirm the model's performance before its deployment; the confirmation needs labeled data. Second, any UDA method will have a few hyper-parameters, needing a certain amount of labeled data. To rectify this misalignment with reality, we rethink UDA from a data-centric point of view. Specifically, we start with the assumption that we do have access to a minimum level of labeled data. Then, we ask how many labeled samples are necessary for finding satisfactory hyper-parameters of existing UDA methods. How well does it work if we use the same data to train the model, e.g., finetuning? We conduct experiments to answer these questions with popular scenarios, {GTA5, SYNTHIA}$\rightarrow$Cityscapes. Our findings are as follows: i) for some UDA methods, good hyper-parameters can be found with only a few labeled samples (i.e., images), e.g., five, but this does not apply to others, and ii) finetuning outperforms most existing UDA methods with only ten labeled images.