Given data generated from multiple factors of variation that cooperatively transform their appearance, disentangled representations aim at reversing the process by mapping data to multiple random variables that individually capture distinct generative factors. As the concept is intuitive but abstract, one needs to quantify it with disentanglement metrics to evaluate and compare the quality of disentangled representations between different models. Current disentanglement metrics are designed to measure the concentration, e.g., absolute deviation, variance, or entropy, of each variable conditioned by each generative factor, optionally offset by the concentration of its marginal distribution, and compare it among different variables. When representations consist of more than two variables, such metrics may fail to detect the interplay between them as they only measure pairwise interactions. In this work, we use the Partial Information Decomposition framework to evaluate information sharing between more than two variables, and build a framework, including a new disentanglement metric, for analyzing how the representations encode the generative factors distinctly, redundantly, and cooperatively. We establish an experimental protocol to assess how each metric evaluates increasingly entangled representations and confirm through artificial and realistic settings that the proposed metric correctly responds to entanglement. Our results are expected to promote information theoretic understanding of disentanglement and lead to further development of metrics as well as learning methods.