Alert button

How Can Self-Attention Networks Recognize Dyck-n Languages?

Add code
Alert button
Oct 09, 2020
Figure 1 for How Can Self-Attention Networks Recognize Dyck-n Languages?
Figure 2 for How Can Self-Attention Networks Recognize Dyck-n Languages?
Figure 3 for How Can Self-Attention Networks Recognize Dyck-n Languages?
Figure 4 for How Can Self-Attention Networks Recognize Dyck-n Languages?

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it:

We focus on the recognition of Dyck-n ($\mathcal{D}_n$) languages with self-attention (SA) networks, which has been deemed to be a difficult task for these networks. We compare the performance of two variants of SA, one with a starting symbol (SA$^+$) and one without (SA$^-$). Our results show that SA$^+$ is able to generalize to longer sequences and deeper dependencies. For $\mathcal{D}_2$, we find that SA$^-$ completely breaks down on long sequences whereas the accuracy of SA$^+$ is 58.82$\%$. We find attention maps learned by $\text{SA}{^+}$ to be amenable to interpretation and compatible with a stack-based language recognizer. Surprisingly, the performance of SA networks is at par with LSTMs, which provides evidence on the ability of SA to learn hierarchies without recursion.

* Findings of EMNLP 2020  

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it: