Convolutional analysis operator learning (CAOL) enables the unsupervised training of (hierachical) convolutional sparsifying operators or autoencoders from large datasets. One can use many training images for CAOL, but a precise understanding of the impact of doing so has remained an open question. This paper presents a series of results that lend insight into the impact of dataset size on the filter update in CAOL. The first result is a general deterministic bound on errors in the estimated filters that then leads to two specific bounds under particular random models. The first bound illustrates a decrease in the expected filter estimation error as the number of training samples increases, and the second bound provides high probability analogues. The bounds depend on properties of the training data, and we investigate their empirical values with real data. Taken together, these results provide evidence for the potential benefit of using more training data in CAOL.