Reinforcement learning is a promising approach to learning robot controllers. It has recently been shown that algorithms based on finite-difference estimates of the policy gradient are competitive with algorithms based on the policy gradient theorem. We propose a theoretical framework for understanding this phenomenon. Our key insight is that many dynamical systems (especially those of interest in robot control tasks) are \emph{nearly deterministic}---i.e., they can be modeled as a deterministic system with a small stochastic perturbation. We show that for such systems, finite-difference estimates of the policy gradient can have substantially lower variance than estimates based on the policy gradient theorem. We interpret these results in the context of counterfactual estimation. Finally, we empirically evaluate our insights in an experiment on the inverted pendulum.