Get our free extension to see links to code for papers anywhere online!

 Add to Chrome

 Add to Firefox

CatalyzeX Code Finder - Browser extension linking code for ML papers across the web! | Product Hunt Embed

Resolving Conflicting Arguments under Uncertainties

Jan 30, 2013
Benson Hin Kwong Ng, Kam-Fai Wong, Boon-Toh Low



Distributed knowledge based applications in open domain rely on common sense information which is bound to be uncertain and incomplete. To draw the useful conclusions from ambiguous data, one must address uncertainties and conflicts incurred in a holistic view. No integrated frameworks are viable without an in-depth analysis of conflicts incurred by uncertainties. In this paper, we give such an analysis and based on the result, propose an integrated framework. Our framework extends definite argumentation theory to model uncertainty. It supports three views over conflicting and uncertain knowledge. Thus, knowledge engineers can draw different conclusions depending on the application context (i.e. view). We also give an illustrative example on strategical decision support to show the practical usefulness of our framework.

* Appears in Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1998) 


Share this with someone who'll enjoy it:

   Access Paper Source



Share this with someone who'll enjoy it: