Federated Lightweight Fine-Tuning

Federated fine-tuning is bottlenecked by communication: FedAvg and pseudo-gradient schemes transmit a payload that scales with the model, and gradient compression shrinks it by only a constant factor. We take a different lever. Mapping networks generate a network's weights from a small trainable latent through a frozen affine projection; because the map is shared and affine, averaging latents is exactly averaging the generated weights. We turn this into a practical low-bandwidth federated channel with two changes: a low-rank, seed-regenerable factorisation of the projection (cutting generator memory from ~80 GB to ~10 MB), and a delta formulation $θ= θ^{\mathrm{pre}} + U V^{\top} z$ that learns an additive correction around a shared centrally-pretrained base -- federated fine-tuning, which is what makes the method work at scale. A frozen orthogonal classifier head further removes the head from the payload while improving accuracy. On CIFAR-100 with ResNet-18+GroupNorm, our method (FLITE, Federated Low-rank Iterative Training Engine) communicates 1,280 floats (~5 KB) per client per round -- an 8718x reduction -- and reaches 74.67%, within ~0.5 pp of full-weight FedAvg. The averaging identity holds to floating-point precision ($6 \times 10^{-8}$); the method sits one to two orders of magnitude below PowerSGD and top-k on the bandwidth-accuracy Pareto; it matches or exceeds full-weight FedAvg under strong non-IID skew. int4 latents reach 648 bytes per round at unchanged accuracy, whereas int4 full-weight FedAvg collapses to chance.

TallyTrain: Communication-Efficient Federated Distillation

Federated learning is bandwidth-bound on two orthogonal axes: model size, which limits how often parameter-averaging methods can afford to merge, and class count, which makes per-probe soft-label distillation prohibitive at large vocabularies. Both ceilings tighten as modern systems scale. We collapse the class-count axis to $\lceil \log_2 C \rceil$ bits per probe by transmitting only each peer's $\arg\max$ class index, where $C$ is the number of output classes. The resulting protocol, TallyTrain, is not merely compressed: under non-IID training it can be preferable to soft-label distillation, because under-trained peers are confidently wrong and majority voting filters this noise where soft-label averaging amplifies it. Across standard benchmarks, TallyTrain matches or beats soft-label distillation at up to three orders of magnitude less communication. We also relax the model-size axis: we compose the cheap hard-label consensus with sparse parameter merges to obtain a bandwidth-bridge variant, which Pareto-dominates every tested operating point of the standard FedAvg, FedProx and FedDF baselines.