SHACR: A Graph-Augmented Semi-Autonomous Framework for Multi-Class Conflict Resolution in Smart Home IoT Automation

Smart home automation increasingly relies on user-defined rules across heterogeneous IoT devices. While these rules appear harmless in isolation, their concurrent execution creates hidden, cross-rule interactions via shared devices, environmental variables, and physical topology. These interactions result in unsafe, wasteful, or privacy-threatening behaviors that are completely invisible to text-only analysis. Existing conflict detectors remain siloed, catching either static syntactic conflicts or specific environment-mediated interactions without unifying the two or providing actionable repairs for non-expert users. This paper presents SHACR, a smart home conflict resolution framework that anchors Large Language Model (LLM) unpredictability by grounding its reasoning in a formal, directed knowledge graph. SHACR encodes devices, capabilities, physical states, and Trigger-Condition-Action rules as typed, traversable entities. By elevating physical cause-effect relationships to first-class graph edges, SHACR transforms conflict detection from fragile text inference into deterministic multi-hop graph traversal, unifying logical, semantic, and physical conflict classes. It drives a closed-loop Scan-Explain-Repair-Validate workflow that uses the graph to bound the LLM's action space. We evaluated SHACR on a testbed of 203 rules deployed across 70 apartments within a smart building. By holding the underlying LLM fixed and introducing SHACR's knowledge graph, classification errors drop by 36.7\%, F1 rises from 0.59 to 0.79, and few-shot calibration further lifts F1 to 0.95, whereas the same calibration barely helps a graph-free LLM. Ultimately, this work challenges the current AI paradigm, establishing that structured knowledge representation is a far more critical factor for dependable IoT automation management than prompt engineering or underlying model architecture.

AI-driven Intent-Based Networking Approach for Self-configuration of Next Generation Networks

Intent-Based Networking (IBN) aims to simplify operating heterogeneous infrastructures by translating high-level intents into enforceable policies and assuring compliance. However, dependable automation remains difficult because (i) realizing intents from ambiguous natural language into controller-ready policies is brittle and prone to conflicts and unintended side effects, and (ii) assurance is often reactive and struggles in multi-intent settings where faults create cascading symptoms and ambiguous telemetry. This paper proposes an end-to-end closed-loop IBN pipeline that uses large language models with structured validation for natural language to policy realization and conflict-aware activation, and reformulates assurance as proactive multi-intent failure prediction with root-cause disambiguation. The expected outcome is operator-trustworthy automation that provides actionable early warnings, interpretable explanations, and measurable lead time for remediation.

MILD: Multi-Intent Learning and Disambiguation for Proactive Failure Prediction in Intent-based Networking

In multi-intent intent-based networks, a single fault can trigger co-drift where multiple intents exhibit symptomatic KPI degradation, creating ambiguity about the true root-cause intent. We present MILD, a proactive framework that reformulates intent assurance from reactive drift detection to fixed-horizon failure prediction with intent-level disambiguation. MILD uses a teacher-augmented Mixture-of-Experts where a gated disambiguation module identifies the root-cause intent while per-intent heads output calibrated risk scores. On a benchmark with non-linear failures and co-drifts, MILD provides 3.8\%--92.5\% longer remediation lead time and improves intent-level root-cause disambiguation accuracy by 9.4\%--45.8\% over baselines. MILD also provides per-alert KPI explanations, enabling actionable diagnosis.

LEAD-Drift: Real-time and Explainable Intent Drift Detection by Learning a Data-Driven Risk Score

Intent-Based Networking (IBN) simplifies network management, but its reliability is challenged by "intent drift", where the network's state gradually deviates from its intended goal, often leading to silent failures. Conventional approaches struggle to detect the subtle, early stages of intent drift, raising alarms only when degradation is significant and failure is imminent, which limits their effectiveness for proactive assurance. To address this, we propose LEAD-Drift, a framework that detects intent drift in real time to enable proactive failure prevention. LEAD-Drift's core contribution is reformulating intent failure detection as a supervised learning problem by training a lightweight neural network on fixed-horizon labels to predict a future risk score. The model's raw output is then smoothed with an Exponential Moving Average (EMA) and passed through a statistically tuned threshold to generate robust, real-time alerts. Furthermore, we enhance the framework with two key features for operational intelligence: a multi-horizon modeling technique for dynamic time-to-failure estimation, and per-alert explainability using SHAP to identify root-cause KPIs. Our evaluation on a time-series dataset shows LEAD-Drift provides significantly earlier warnings, improving the average lead time by 7.3 minutes (+17.8\%) compared to a distance-based baseline. It also reduces alert noise by 80.2\% compared to a weighted-KPI heuristic, with only a minor trade-off in lead time. These results demonstrate that LEAD-Drift as a highly effective, interpretable, and operationally efficient solution for proactive network assurance in IBN.