Quantifying the Effect of Image Similarity on Diabetic Foot Ulcer Classification

This research conducts an investigation on the effect of visually similar images within a publicly available diabetic foot ulcer dataset when training deep learning classification networks. The presence of binary-identical duplicate images in datasets used to train deep learning algorithms is a well known issue that can introduce unwanted bias which can degrade network performance. However, the effect of visually similar non-identical images is an under-researched topic, and has so far not been investigated in any diabetic foot ulcer studies. We use an open-source fuzzy algorithm to identify groups of increasingly similar images in the Diabetic Foot Ulcers Challenge 2021 (DFUC2021) training dataset. Based on each similarity threshold, we create new training sets that we use to train a range of deep learning multi-class classifiers. We then evaluate the performance of the best performing model on the DFUC2021 test set. Our findings show that the model trained on the training set with the 80\% similarity threshold images removed achieved the best performance using the InceptionResNetV2 network. This model showed improvements in F1-score, precision, and recall of 0.023, 0.029, and 0.013, respectively. These results indicate that highly similar images can contribute towards the presence of performance degrading bias within the Diabetic Foot Ulcers Challenge 2021 dataset, and that the removal of images that are 80\% similar from the training set can help to boost classification performance.

Diabetic Foot Ulcer Grand Challenge 2022 Summary

The Diabetic Foot Ulcer Challenge 2022 focused on the task of diabetic foot ulcer segmentation, based on the work completed in previous DFU challenges. The challenge provided 4000 images of full-view foot ulcer images together with corresponding delineation of ulcer regions. This paper provides an overview of the challenge, a summary of the methods proposed by the challenge participants, the results obtained from each technique, and a comparison of the challenge results. The best-performing network was a modified HarDNet-MSEG, with a Dice score of 0.7287.