Learning to Fine-tune Foundation Models under Resource Limitations

We study the problem of optimal continual fine-tuning for a pre-trained Foundation Model deployed at a resource-limited device. At each time slot, a new batch of training data arrives, and the controller is faced with two options: either use the data to fine-tune the model and incur a compute cost, or do not fine-tune the model and discard the data. After the decision, the performance of the current model is measured in terms of an application-specific performance metric such as classification accuracy. Our objective is to learn an optimal policy that determines \emph{when to fine-tune the model} on a single task (e.g., sentiment analysis), under a finite compute budget. We formulate this online decision-making problem as a constrained Markov Decision Process, where the system state captures three essential aspects: (\textit{i}) model's performance, (\textit{ii}) computational budget, and (\textit{iii}) data distribution relevance to historic data encountered up to that point. The transition to the next state is stochastic and therefore, we propose a reinforcement learning-based method to solve this problem, namely the \emph{actor-critic} algorithm. We also consider the special case where the performance of fine-tuning for a given model can be predicted or estimated prior to decision; in this case the problem becomes a Dynamic Programming one. Experiments with a large pre-trained model on a widely-used text classification dataset demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms fine-tuning approaches with the same compute budget by more than $4\%$ in terms of accuracy and achieves $97\%$ of full-parameter fine-tuning accuracy while requiring only $25\%$ of the fine-tuning steps.

Explainability and Continual Learning meet Federated Learning at the Network Edge

As edge devices become more capable and pervasive in wireless networks, there is growing interest in leveraging their collective compute power for distributed learning. However, optimizing learning at the network edge entails unique challenges, particularly when moving beyond conventional settings and objectives. While Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a key paradigm for distributed model training, critical challenges persist. First, existing approaches often overlook the trade-off between predictive accuracy and interpretability. Second, they struggle to integrate inherently explainable models such as decision trees because their non-differentiable structure makes them not amenable to backpropagation-based training algorithms. Lastly, they lack meaningful mechanisms for continual Machine Learning (ML) model adaptation through Continual Learning (CL) in resource-limited environments. In this paper, we pave the way for a set of novel optimization problems that emerge in distributed learning at the network edge with wirelessly interconnected edge devices, and we identify key challenges and future directions. Specifically, we discuss how Multi-objective optimization (MOO) can be used to address the trade-off between predictive accuracy and explainability when using complex predictive models. Next, we discuss the implications of integrating inherently explainable tree-based models into distributed learning settings. Finally, we investigate how CL strategies can be effectively combined with FL to support adaptive, lifelong learning when limited-size buffers are used to store past data for retraining. Our approach offers a cohesive set of tools for designing privacy-preserving, adaptive, and trustworthy ML solutions tailored to the demands of edge computing and intelligent services.

Joint Explainability-Performance Optimization With Surrogate Models for AI-Driven Edge Services

Explainable AI is a crucial component for edge services, as it ensures reliable decision making based on complex AI models. Surrogate models are a prominent approach of XAI where human-interpretable models, such as a linear regression model, are trained to approximate a complex (black-box) model's predictions. This paper delves into the balance between the predictive accuracy of complex AI models and their approximation by surrogate ones, advocating that both these models benefit from being learned simultaneously. We derive a joint (bi-level) training scheme for both models and we introduce a new algorithm based on multi-objective optimization (MOO) to simultaneously minimize both the complex model's prediction error and the error between its outputs and those of the surrogate. Our approach leads to improvements that exceed 99% in the approximation of the black-box model through the surrogate one, as measured by the metric of Fidelity, for a compromise of less than 3% absolute reduction in the black-box model's predictive accuracy, compared to single-task and multi-task learning baselines. By improving Fidelity, we can derive more trustworthy explanations of the complex model's outcomes from the surrogate, enabling reliable AI applications for intelligent services at the network edge.