Colour Contrast on the Web: A WCAG 2.1 Level AA Compliance Audit of Common Crawl's Top 500 Domains

We present a large-scale automated audit of WCAG 2.1/2.2 Level AA colour contrast compliance across the 500 most frequently crawled registered domains in Common Crawl's CC-MAIN-2026-08 February 2026 crawl archive. Rather than conducting a live crawl, all page content was sourced from Common Crawl's open WARC archives, ensuring reproducibility and eliminating any load on target web servers. Our static CSS analysis of 240 homepages identified 4,327 unique foreground/background colour pairings, of which 1,771 (40.9%) failed to meet the 4.5:1 contrast ratio threshold for normal text. The median per-site pass rate was 62.7%, with 20.4% of sites achieving full compliance across all detected colour pairings. These findings suggest that colour contrast remains a widespread accessibility barrier on the most prominent websites, with significant variation across domain categories.

CommonLID: Re-evaluating State-of-the-Art Language Identification Performance on Web Data

Language identification (LID) is a fundamental step in curating multilingual corpora. However, LID models still perform poorly for many languages, especially on the noisy and heterogeneous web data often used to train multilingual language models. In this paper, we introduce CommonLID, a community-driven, human-annotated LID benchmark for the web domain, covering 109 languages. Many of the included languages have been previously under-served, making CommonLID a key resource for developing more representative high-quality text corpora. We show CommonLID's value by using it, alongside five other common evaluation sets, to test eight popular LID models. We analyse our results to situate our contribution and to provide an overview of the state of the art. In particular, we highlight that existing evaluations overestimate LID accuracy for many languages in the web domain. We make CommonLID and the code used to create it available under an open, permissive license.