Analysis of Systems' Performance in Natural Language Processing Competitions

Collaborative competitions have gained popularity in the scientific and technological fields. These competitions involve defining tasks, selecting evaluation scores, and devising result verification methods. In the standard scenario, participants receive a training set and are expected to provide a solution for a held-out dataset kept by organizers. An essential challenge for organizers arises when comparing algorithms' performance, assessing multiple participants, and ranking them. Statistical tools are often used for this purpose; however, traditional statistical methods often fail to capture decisive differences between systems' performance. This manuscript describes an evaluation methodology for statistically analyzing competition results and competition. The methodology is designed to be universally applicable; however, it is illustrated using eight natural language competitions as case studies involving classification and regression problems. The proposed methodology offers several advantages, including off-the-shell comparisons with correction mechanisms and the inclusion of confidence intervals. Furthermore, we introduce metrics that allow organizers to assess the difficulty of competitions. Our analysis shows the potential usefulness of our methodology for effectively evaluating competition results.

Comparison of classifiers in challenge scheme

In recent decades, challenges have become very popular in scientific research as these are crowdsourcing schemes. In particular, challenges are essential for developing machine learning algorithms. For the challenges settings, it is vital to establish the scientific question, the dataset (with adequate quality, quantity, diversity, and complexity), performance metrics, as well as a way to authenticate the participants' results (Gold Standard). This paper addresses the problem of evaluating the performance of different competitors (algorithms) under the restrictions imposed by the challenge scheme, such as the comparison of multiple competitors with a unique dataset (with fixed size), a minimal number of submissions and, a set of metrics chosen to assess performance. The algorithms are sorted according to the performance metric. Still, it is common to observe performance differences among competitors as small as hundredths or even thousandths, so the question is whether the differences are significant. This paper analyzes the results of the MeOffendEs@IberLEF 2021 competition and proposes to make inference through resampling techniques (bootstrap) to support Challenge organizers' decision-making.