Reordering Examples Helps during Priming-based Few-Shot Learning

The ability to learn from limited data, or few-shot learning, is a desirable and often critical requirement for NLP systems. While many existing methods do poorly at learning from a handful of examples, large pretrained language models have recently been shown to be efficient few-shot learners. One approach to few-shot learning, which does not require finetuning of model parameters, is to augment the language model's input with priming text which is typically constructed using task specific descriptions and examples. In this work, we further explore priming-based few-shot learning, with focus on using examples as prompts. We show that presenting examples in the right order is key for generalization. We introduce PERO (Prompting with Examples in the Right Order), where we formulate few-shot learning as search over the set of permutations of the training examples. We show that PERO can learn to generalize efficiently using as few as 10 examples, in contrast to existing approaches. While the newline token is a natural choice for separating the examples in the prompt, we show that learning a new separator token can potentially provide further gains in performance. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method on the tasks of sentiment classification, natural language inference and fact retrieval. Finally, we analyze the learned prompts to reveal novel insights, including the idea that two training examples in the right order alone can provide competitive performance for sentiment classification and natural language inference.

NILE : Natural Language Inference with Faithful Natural Language Explanations

The recent growth in the popularity and success of deep learning models on NLP classification tasks has accompanied the need for generating some form of natural language explanation of the predicted labels. Such generated natural language (NL) explanations are expected to be faithful, i.e., they should correlate well with the model's internal decision making. In this work, we focus on the task of natural language inference (NLI) and address the following question: can we build NLI systems which produce labels with high accuracy, while also generating faithful explanations of its decisions? We propose Natural-language Inference over Label-specific Explanations (NILE), a novel NLI method which utilizes auto-generated label-specific NL explanations to produce labels along with its faithful explanation. We demonstrate NILE's effectiveness over previously reported methods through automated and human evaluation of the produced labels and explanations. Our evaluation of NILE also supports the claim that accurate systems capable of providing testable explanations of their decisions can be designed. We discuss the faithfulness of NILE's explanations in terms of sensitivity of the decisions to the corresponding explanations. We argue that explicit evaluation of faithfulness, in addition to label and explanation accuracy, is an important step in evaluating model's explanations. Further, we demonstrate that task-specific probes are necessary to establish such sensitivity.