Variance Is Not Importance: Structural Analysis of Transformer Compressibility Across Model Scales

We present a systematic empirical study of transformer compression through over 40 experiments on GPT-2 (124M parameters) and Mistral 7B (7.24B parameters). Our analysis covers spectral compression, block-level function replacement, rotation-based quantization, activation geometry, and adaptive early exit. We identify five structural properties relevant to compression. (1) Variance is not importance: high-variance activation directions are approximately 96 percent uncorrelated with predictive directions (measured via CCA), and projecting onto these subspaces preserves over 90 percent of variance while degrading perplexity. (2) Block linearity is conditional: transformer blocks are approximately linear (R^2 ~ 0.95 on GPT-2, 0.93 on Mistral block 31) only under the correct upstream distribution; modifying earlier blocks induces distribution shift that degrades downstream approximations. (3) The reconstruction wall: approaches that factor weights into quantized components amplify errors through cross-terms, making direct quantization strictly superior. (4) Linearity increases with depth: Mistral 7B exhibits a progression from R^2 = 0.17 (block 0) to R^2 = 0.93 (block 31), indicating a division between nonlinear feature construction and linear refinement. (5) Approximately 30 percent of tokens are computationally easy, confirmed via exit heads and KL divergence sensitivity. We demonstrate that single-block linear replacement achieves 34x compression with a 1.71 perplexity increase on the final block of Mistral 7B, while multi-block replacement fails due to residual error accumulation and distribution shift. These findings suggest fundamental limits to static post-training compression and motivate adaptive, per-token computation as a more effective direction.

Quantization Dominates Rank Reduction for KV-Cache Compression

We compare two strategies for compressing the KV cache in transformer inference: rank reduction (discard dimensions) and quantization (keep all dimensions, reduce precision). At matched storage budgets across five models (124M-14B, MHA and GQA), we find that quantization consistently outperforms rank reduction by 4-364 PPL depending on model and compression level. The gap persists even when rank reduction is combined with quantization in hybrid baselines, and it grows with GQA aggressiveness. On LAMBADA, INT4 matches FP16 accuracy (+0.23 PPL on Mistral 7B, +0.58 on GPT-2) while rank-32 at identical storage collapses to 0.4%. We trace this gap to a structural asymmetry: under softmax attention routing, removing a dimension can flip which token is attended (a discrete failure), while quantization noise is bounded and typically preserves score ordering. We formalize this via a perturbation result showing projection damage exceeds quantization damage by 3 x 2^(2b) per direction under the softmax Fisher metric. A basis ablation confirms the finding is basis-independent (spread <0.4 PPL), establishing that the advantage comes from preserving dimensions, not from a better coordinate system. Joint K+V INT4 quantization achieves 75% total KV reduction at only +0.18 PPL on Mistral 7B.