Decentralized Sporadic Federated Learning: A Unified Methodology with Generalized Convergence Guarantees

Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL) has received significant recent research attention, capturing settings where both model updates and model aggregations -- the two key FL processes -- are conducted by the clients. In this work, we propose Decentralized Sporadic Federated Learning ($\texttt{DSpodFL}$), a DFL methodology which generalizes the notion of sporadicity in both of these processes, modeling the impact of different forms of heterogeneity that manifest in realistic DFL settings. $\texttt{DSpodFL}$ unifies many of the prominent decentralized optimization methods, e.g., distributed gradient descent (DGD), randomized gossip (RG), and decentralized federated averaging (DFedAvg), under a single modeling framework. We analytically characterize the convergence behavior of $\texttt{DSpodFL}$, showing, among other insights, that we can match a geometric convergence rate to a finite optimality gap under more general assumptions than in existing works. Through experiments, we demonstrate that $\texttt{DSpodFL}$ achieves significantly improved training speeds and robustness to variations in system parameters compared to the state-of-the-art.

The Impact of Adversarial Node Placement in Decentralized Federated Learning Networks

As Federated Learning (FL) grows in popularity, new decentralized frameworks are becoming widespread. These frameworks leverage the benefits of decentralized environments to enable fast and energy-efficient inter-device communication. However, this growing popularity also intensifies the need for robust security measures. While existing research has explored various aspects of FL security, the role of adversarial node placement in decentralized networks remains largely unexplored. This paper addresses this gap by analyzing the performance of decentralized FL for various adversarial placement strategies when adversaries can jointly coordinate their placement within a network. We establish two baseline strategies for placing adversarial node: random placement and network centrality-based placement. Building on this foundation, we propose a novel attack algorithm that prioritizes adversarial spread over adversarial centrality by maximizing the average network distance between adversaries. We show that the new attack algorithm significantly impacts key performance metrics such as testing accuracy, outperforming the baseline frameworks by between 9% and 66.5% for the considered setups. Our findings provide valuable insights into the vulnerabilities of decentralized FL systems, setting the stage for future research aimed at developing more secure and robust decentralized FL frameworks.

On the Effects of Data Heterogeneity on the Convergence Rates of Distributed Linear System Solvers

We consider the fundamental problem of solving a large-scale system of linear equations. In particular, we consider the setting where a taskmaster intends to solve the system in a distributed/federated fashion with the help of a set of machines, who each have a subset of the equations. Although there exist several approaches for solving this problem, missing is a rigorous comparison between the convergence rates of the projection-based methods and those of the optimization-based ones. In this paper, we analyze and compare these two classes of algorithms with a particular focus on the most efficient method from each class, namely, the recently proposed Accelerated Projection-Based Consensus (APC) and the Distributed Heavy-Ball Method (D-HBM). To this end, we first propose a geometric notion of data heterogeneity called angular heterogeneity and discuss its generality. Using this notion, we bound and compare the convergence rates of the studied algorithms and capture the effects of both cross-machine and local data heterogeneity on these quantities. Our analysis results in a number of novel insights besides showing that APC is the most efficient method in realistic scenarios where there is a large data heterogeneity. Our numerical analyses validate our theoretical results.