Abstract:Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) has become a widely adopted algorithm for reinforcement learning, offering a practical policy gradient method with strong empirical performance. Despite its popularity, PPO lacks formal theoretical guarantees for policy improvement and convergence. PPO is motivated by Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO) that utilizes a surrogate loss with a KL divergence penalty, which arises from linearizing the value function within a flat geometric space. In this paper, we derive a tighter surrogate in the Fisher-Rao (FR) geometry, yielding a novel variant, Fisher-Rao PPO (FR-PPO). Our proposed scheme provides strong theoretical guarantees, including monotonic policy improvement. Furthermore, in the tabular setting, we demonstrate that FR-PPO achieves sub-linear convergence without any dependence on the dimensionality of the action or state spaces, marking a significant step toward establishing formal convergence results for PPO-based algorithms.
Abstract:We study the problem of minimizing non-convex functionals on the space of probability measures, regularized by the relative entropy (KL divergence) with respect to a fixed reference measure, as well as the corresponding problem of solving entropy-regularized non-convex-non-concave min-max problems. We utilize the Best Response flow (also known in the literature as the fictitious play flow) and study how its convergence is influenced by the relation between the degree of non-convexity of the functional under consideration, the regularization parameter and the tail behaviour of the reference measure. In particular, we demonstrate how to choose the regularizer, given the non-convex functional, so that the Best Response operator becomes a contraction with respect to the $L^1$-Wasserstein distance, which then ensures the existence of its unique fixed point, which is then shown to be the unique global minimizer for our optimization problem. This extends recent results where the Best Response flow was applied to solve convex optimization problems regularized by the relative entropy with respect to arbitrary reference measures, and with arbitrary values of the regularization parameter. Our results explain precisely how the assumption of convexity can be relaxed, at the expense of making a specific choice of the regularizer. Additionally, we demonstrate how these results can be applied in reinforcement learning in the context of policy optimization for Markov Decision Processes and Markov games with softmax parametrized policies in the mean-field regime.
Abstract:We investigate proximal descent methods, inspired by the minimizing movement scheme introduced by Jordan, Kinderlehrer and Otto, for optimizing entropy-regularized functionals on the Wasserstein space. We establish linear convergence under flat convexity assumptions, thereby relaxing the common reliance on geodesic convexity. Our analysis circumvents the need for discrete-time adaptations of the Evolution Variational Inequality (EVI). Instead, we leverage a uniform logarithmic Sobolev inequality (LSI) and the entropy "sandwich" lemma, extending the analysis from arXiv:2201.10469 and arXiv:2202.01009. The major challenge in the proof via LSI is to show that the relative Fisher information $I(\cdot|\pi)$ is well-defined at every step of the scheme. Since the relative entropy is not Wasserstein differentiable, we prove that along the scheme the iterates belong to a certain class of Sobolev regularity, and hence the relative entropy $\operatorname{KL}(\cdot|\pi)$ has a unique Wasserstein sub-gradient, and that the relative Fisher information is indeed finite.
Abstract:We study two variants of the mirror descent-ascent algorithm for solving min-max problems on the space of measures: simultaneous and sequential. We work under assumptions of convexity-concavity and relative smoothness of the payoff function with respect to a suitable Bregman divergence, defined on the space of measures via flat derivatives. We show that the convergence rates to mixed Nash equilibria, measured in the Nikaid\`o-Isoda error, are of order $\mathcal{O}\left(N^{-1/2}\right)$ and $\mathcal{O}\left(N^{-2/3}\right)$ for the simultaneous and sequential schemes, respectively, which is in line with the state-of-the-art results for related finite-dimensional algorithms.