Developing AI tools that preserve fairness is of critical importance, specifically in high-stakes applications such as those in healthcare. However, health AI models' overall prediction performance is often prioritized over the possible biases such models could have. In this study, we show one possible approach to mitigate bias concerns by having healthcare institutions collaborate through a federated learning paradigm (FL; which is a popular choice in healthcare settings). While FL methods with an emphasis on fairness have been previously proposed, their underlying model and local implementation techniques, as well as their possible applications to the healthcare domain remain widely underinvestigated. Therefore, we propose a comprehensive FL approach with adversarial debiasing and a fair aggregation method, suitable to various fairness metrics, in the healthcare domain where electronic health records are used. Not only our approach explicitly mitigates bias as part of the optimization process, but an FL-based paradigm would also implicitly help with addressing data imbalance and increasing the data size, offering a practical solution for healthcare applications. We empirically demonstrate our method's superior performance on multiple experiments simulating large-scale real-world scenarios and compare it to several baselines. Our method has achieved promising fairness performance with the lowest impact on overall discrimination performance (accuracy).
An increasing amount of research is being devoted to applying machine learning methods to electronic health record (EHR) data for various clinical tasks. This growing area of research has exposed the limitation of accessibility of EHR datasets for all, as well as the reproducibility of different modeling frameworks. One reason for these limitations is the lack of standardized pre-processing pipelines. MIMIC is a freely available EHR dataset in a raw format that has been used in numerous studies. The absence of standardized pre-processing steps serves as a major barrier to the wider adoption of the dataset. It also leads to different cohorts being used in downstream tasks, limiting the ability to compare the results among similar studies. Contrasting studies also use various distinct performance metrics, which can greatly reduce the ability to compare model results. In this work, we provide an end-to-end fully customizable pipeline to extract, clean, and pre-process data; and to predict and evaluate the fourth version of the MIMIC dataset (MIMIC-IV) for ICU and non-ICU-related clinical time-series prediction tasks.