Are Multimodal Foundation Models All That Is Needed for Emofake Detection?

In this work, we investigate multimodal foundation models (MFMs) for EmoFake detection (EFD) and hypothesize that they will outperform audio foundation models (AFMs). MFMs due to their cross-modal pre-training, learns emotional patterns from multiple modalities, while AFMs rely only on audio. As such, MFMs can better recognize unnatural emotional shifts and inconsistencies in manipulated audio, making them more effective at distinguishing real from fake emotional expressions. To validate our hypothesis, we conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of state-of-the-art (SOTA) MFMs (e.g. LanguageBind) alongside AFMs (e.g. WavLM). Our experiments confirm that MFMs surpass AFMs for EFD. Beyond individual foundation models (FMs) performance, we explore FMs fusion, motivated by findings in related research areas such synthetic speech detection and speech emotion recognition. To this end, we propose SCAR, a novel framework for effective fusion. SCAR introduces a nested cross-attention mechanism, where representations from FMs interact at two stages sequentially to refine information exchange. Additionally, a self-attention refinement module further enhances feature representations by reinforcing important cross-FM cues while suppressing noise. Through SCAR with synergistic fusion of MFMs, we achieve SOTA performance, surpassing both standalone FMs and conventional fusion approaches and previous works on EFD.

Rethinking Cross-Corpus Speech Emotion Recognition Benchmarking: Are Paralinguistic Pre-Trained Representations Sufficient?

Recent benchmarks evaluating pre-trained models (PTMs) for cross-corpus speech emotion recognition (SER) have overlooked PTM pre-trained for paralinguistic speech processing (PSP), raising concerns about their reliability, since SER is inherently a paralinguistic task. We hypothesize that PSP-focused PTM will perform better in cross-corpus SER settings. To test this, we analyze state-of-the-art PTMs representations including paralinguistic, monolingual, multilingual, and speaker recognition. Our results confirm that TRILLsson (a paralinguistic PTM) outperforms others, reinforcing the need to consider PSP-focused PTMs in cross-corpus SER benchmarks. This study enhances benchmark trustworthiness and guides PTMs evaluations for reliable cross-corpus SER.