Continual learning benefits from multiple sleep mechanisms: NREM, REM, and Synaptic Downscaling

Learning new tasks and skills in succession without losing prior learning (i.e., catastrophic forgetting) is a computational challenge for both artificial and biological neural networks, yet artificial systems struggle to achieve parity with their biological analogues. Mammalian brains employ numerous neural operations in support of continual learning during sleep. These are ripe for artificial adaptation. Here, we investigate how modeling three distinct components of mammalian sleep together affects continual learning in artificial neural networks: (1) a veridical memory replay process observed during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep; (2) a generative memory replay process linked to REM sleep; and (3) a synaptic downscaling process which has been proposed to tune signal-to-noise ratios and support neural upkeep. We find benefits from the inclusion of all three sleep components when evaluating performance on a continual learning CIFAR-100 image classification benchmark. Maximum accuracy improved during training and catastrophic forgetting was reduced during later tasks. While some catastrophic forgetting persisted over the course of network training, higher levels of synaptic downscaling lead to better retention of early tasks and further facilitated the recovery of early task accuracy during subsequent training. One key takeaway is that there is a trade-off at hand when considering the level of synaptic downscaling to use - more aggressive downscaling better protects early tasks, but less downscaling enhances the ability to learn new tasks. Intermediate levels can strike a balance with the highest overall accuracies during training. Overall, our results both provide insight into how to adapt sleep components to enhance artificial continual learning systems and highlight areas for future neuroscientific sleep research to further such systems.

Evaluating semantic models with word-sentence relatedness

Semantic textual similarity (STS) systems are designed to encode and evaluate the semantic similarity between words, phrases, sentences, and documents. One method for assessing the quality or authenticity of semantic information encoded in these systems is by comparison with human judgments. A data set for evaluating semantic models was developed consisting of 775 English word-sentence pairs, each annotated for semantic relatedness by human raters engaged in a Maximum Difference Scaling (MDS) task, as well as a faster alternative task. As a sample application of this relatedness data, behavior-based relatedness was compared to the relatedness computed via four off-the-shelf STS models: n-gram, Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA), Word2Vec, and UMBC Ebiquity. Some STS models captured much of the variance in the human judgments collected, but they were not sensitive to the implicatures and entailments that were processed and considered by the participants. All text stimuli and judgment data have been made freely available.