torchtune: PyTorch native post-training library

Modern LLMs typically require multistage training pipelines to achieve strong downstream performance, with post-training serving as the main interface for adapting open-weight models. We introduce torchtune, a PyTorch-native library designed to streamline the post-training lifecycle of LLMs, enabling efficient fine-tuning, experimentation, and deployment-oriented workflows. Unlike many existing fine-tuning frameworks, which often optimize for ease of use, specialized recipes, or hardware efficiency at the cost of transparency and extensibility, torchtune emphasizes modularity, hackability, and direct access to the underlying PyTorch components. In this paper, we present the design principles behind torchtune, describe how they are reflected in its model builders, training recipes, and distributed training stack, and evaluate the library across representative post-training settings. We compare against popular fine-tuning frameworks, including Axolotl and Unsloth, and show that torchtune provides strong performance and memory efficiency across many settings while remaining flexible enough for rapid research iteration. These results position torchtune as a practical foundation for reproducible LLMs post-training research.

Multiple Choice Questions and Large Languages Models: A Case Study with Fictional Medical Data

Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT demonstrate significant potential in the medical field, often evaluated using multiple-choice questions (MCQs) similar to those found on the USMLE. Despite their prevalence in medical education, MCQs have limitations that might be exacerbated when assessing LLMs. To evaluate the effectiveness of MCQs in assessing the performance of LLMs, we developed a fictional medical benchmark focused on a non-existent gland, the Glianorex. This approach allowed us to isolate the knowledge of the LLM from its test-taking abilities. We used GPT-4 to generate a comprehensive textbook on the Glianorex in both English and French and developed corresponding multiple-choice questions in both languages. We evaluated various open-source, proprietary, and domain-specific LLMs using these questions in a zero-shot setting. The models achieved average scores around 67%, with minor performance differences between larger and smaller models. Performance was slightly higher in English than in French. Fine-tuned medical models showed some improvement over their base versions in English but not in French. The uniformly high performance across models suggests that traditional MCQ-based benchmarks may not accurately measure LLMs' clinical knowledge and reasoning abilities, instead highlighting their pattern recognition skills. This study underscores the need for more robust evaluation methods to better assess the true capabilities of LLMs in medical contexts.