Bootstrapping Developmental AIs: From Simple Competences to Intelligent Human-Compatible AIs

Although some AIs surpass human abilities in closed artificial worlds such as board games, in the real world they make strange mistakes and do not notice them. They cannot be instructed easily, fail to use common sense, and lack curiosity. Mainstream approaches for creating AIs include the traditional manually-constructed symbolic AI approach and the generative and deep learning AI approaches including large language models (LLMs). Although it is outside of the mainstream, the developmental bootstrapping approach may have more potential. In developmental bootstrapping, AIs develop competences like human children do. They start with innate competences. They interact with the environment and learn from their interactions. They incrementally extend their innate competences with self-developed competences. They interact and learn from people and establish perceptual, cognitive, and common grounding. They acquire the competences they need through competence bootstrapping. However, developmental robotics has not yet produced AIs with robust adult-level competences. Projects have typically stopped before reaching the Toddler Barrier. This corresponds to human infant development at about two years of age, before infant speech becomes fluent. They also do not bridge the Reading Barrier, where they could skillfully and skeptically draw on the socially developed online information resources that power LLMs. The next competences in human cognitive development involve intrinsic motivation, imitation learning, imagination, coordination, and communication. This position paper lays out the logic, prospects, gaps, and challenges for extending the practice of developmental bootstrapping to create robust, trustworthy, and human-compatible AIs.

Roots and Requirements for Collaborative AI

The vision of AI collaborators has long been a staple of science fiction, where artificial agents understand nuances of collaboration and human communication. They bring advantages to their human collaborators and teams by contributing their special talents. Government advisory groups and leaders in AI have advocated for years that AIs should be human compatible and be capable of effective collaboration. Nonetheless, robust AIs that can collaborate like talented people remain out of reach. This position paper draws on a cognitive analysis of what effective and robust collaboration requires of human and artificial agents. It sketches a history of public and AI visions for artificial collaborators, starting with early visions of intelligence augmentation (IA) and artificial intelligence (AI). It is intended as motivation and context for a second position paper on collaborative AI (Stefik & Price, 2023). The second paper reviews the multi-disciplinary state-of-the-art and proposes a roadmap for bootstrapping collaborative AIs.