Leveraging Asynchronous Cross-border Market Data for Improved Day-Ahead Electricity Price Forecasting in European Markets

Accurate short-term electricity price forecasting is crucial for strategically scheduling demand and generation bids in day-ahead markets. While data-driven techniques have shown considerable prowess in achieving high forecast accuracy in recent years, they rely heavily on the quality of input covariates. In this paper, we investigate whether asynchronously published prices as a result of differing gate closure times (GCTs) in some bidding zones can improve forecasting accuracy in other markets with later GCTs. Using a state-of-the-art ensemble of models, we show significant improvements of 22% and 9% in forecast accuracy in the Belgian (BE) and Swedish bidding zones (SE3) respectively, when including price data from interconnected markets with earlier GCT (Germany-Luxembourg, Austria, and Switzerland). This improvement holds for both general as well as extreme market conditions. Our analysis also yields further important insights: frequent model recalibration is necessary for maximum accuracy but comes at substantial additional computational costs, and using data from more markets does not always lead to better performance - a fact we delve deeper into with interpretability analysis of the forecast models. Overall, these findings provide valuable guidance for market participants and decision-makers aiming to optimize bidding strategies within increasingly interconnected and volatile European energy markets.

Is your forecaster smarter than an energy engineer: a deep dive into electricity price forecasting

The field of electricity price forecasting has seen significant advances in the last years, including the development of new, more accurate forecast models. These models leverage statistical relationships in previously observed data to predict the future; however, there is a lack of analysis explaining these models, which limits their real world applicability in critical infrastructure. In this paper, using data from the Belgian electricity markets, we explore a state-of-the-art forecasting model to understand if its predictions can be trusted in more general settings than the limited context it is trained in. If the model produces poor predictions in extreme conditions or if its predictions are inconsistent with reality, it cannot be relied upon in real-world where these forecasts are used in downstream decision-making activities. Our results show that, despite being largely accurate enough in general, even state of the art forecasts struggle with remaining consistent with reality.