Abstract:Legal retrieval over jurisprudential collections is challenging because court decisions are long, heterogeneous documents whose relevant legal thesis may occupy only a small portion of the text. This paper asks whether legal nuggets, defined as short and self-contained legal theses extracted from source documents, can improve dense retrieval over Brazilian legal collections. We propose a pipeline that extracts nuggets from each document, indexes them with embeddings, retrieves nugget-level evidence, and aggregates the retrieved nuggets back to document-level rankings. We evaluate this approach on four Portuguese legal retrieval benchmarks from the JUA ecosystem, reporting NDCG@10, MAP@10, and MRR@10. Nugget retrieval substantially improves the two jurisprudential datasets: on JUA-Juris, NDCG@10 increases from 0.10265 to 0.20461, and on JurisTCU from 0.20898 to 0.32696. However, it underperforms full-document retrieval on NormasTCU and BR-TaxQA, and an embedding-model ablation shows that strong domain-adapted retrievers can remain better in the full-document setting. The results demonstrate that legal nuggets can be useful for jurisprudence search, especially when queries are formulated as legal theses, but they may not transfer equally well to other legal retrieval scenarios.
Abstract:The evaluation of open-ended responses in serious games presents a unique challenge, as correctness is often subjective. Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being explored as evaluators in such contexts, yet their accuracy and consistency remain uncertain, particularly for smaller models intended for local execution. This study investigates the reliability of five small-scale LLMs when assessing player responses in \textit{En-join}, a game that simulates decision-making within energy communities. By leveraging traditional binary classification metrics (including accuracy, true positive rate, and true negative rate), we systematically compare these models across different evaluation scenarios. Our results highlight the strengths and limitations of each model, revealing trade-offs between sensitivity, specificity, and overall performance. We demonstrate that while some models excel at identifying correct responses, others struggle with false positives or inconsistent evaluations. The findings highlight the need for context-aware evaluation frameworks and careful model selection when deploying LLMs as evaluators. This work contributes to the broader discourse on the trustworthiness of AI-driven assessment tools, offering insights into how different LLM architectures handle subjective evaluation tasks.

Abstract:This proposal aims to develop more accurate federated learning (FL) methods with faster convergence properties and lower communication requirements, specifically for forecasting distributed energy resources (DER) such as renewables, energy storage, and loads in modern, low-carbon power grids. This will be achieved by (i) leveraging recently developed extensions of FL such as hierarchical and iterative clustering to improve performance with non-IID data, (ii) experimenting with different types of FL global models well-suited to time-series data, and (iii) incorporating domain-specific knowledge from power systems to build more general FL frameworks and architectures that can be applied to diverse types of DERs beyond just load forecasting, and with heterogeneous clients.




Abstract:We propose a comprehensive approach to increase the reliability and resilience of future power grids rich in distributed energy resources. Our distributed scheme combines federated learning-based attack detection with a local electricity market-based attack mitigation method. We validate the scheme by applying it to a real-world distribution grid rich in solar PV. Simulation results demonstrate that the approach is feasible and can successfully mitigate the grid impacts of cyber-physical attacks.