Mixing syntagmatic and paradigmatic information for concept detection

In the last decades, philosophers have begun using empirical data for conceptual analysis, but corpus-based conceptual analysis has so far failed to develop, in part because of the absence of reliable methods to automatically detect concepts in textual data. Previous attempts have shown that topic models can constitute efficient concept detection heuristics, but while they leverage the syntagmatic relations in a corpus, they fail to exploit paradigmatic relations, and thus probably fail to model concepts accurately. In this article, we show that using a topic model that models concepts on a space of word embeddings (Hu and Tsujii, 2016) can lead to significant increases in concept detection performance, as well as enable the target concept to be expressed in more flexible ways using word vectors.

Detecting Large Concept Extensions for Conceptual Analysis

When performing a conceptual analysis of a concept, philosophers are interested in all forms of expression of a concept in a text---be it direct or indirect, explicit or implicit. In this paper, we experiment with topic-based methods of automating the detection of concept expressions in order to facilitate philosophical conceptual analysis. We propose six methods based on LDA, and evaluate them on a new corpus of court decision that we had annotated by experts and non-experts. Our results indicate that these methods can yield important improvements over the keyword heuristic, which is often used as a concept detection heuristic in many contexts. While more work remains to be done, this indicates that detecting concepts through topics can serve as a general-purpose method for at least some forms of concept expression that are not captured using naive keyword approaches.