Pre-Deployment Complexity Estimation for Federated Perception Systems

Edge AI systems increasingly rely on federated learning to train perception models in distributed, privacy-preserving, and resource-constrained environments. Yet, before training begins, practitioners often lack practical tools to estimate how difficult a federated learning task will be in terms of achievable accuracy and communication cost. This paper presents a classifier-agnostic, pre-deployment framework for estimating learning complexity in federated perception systems by jointly modeling intrinsic properties of the data and characteristics of the distributed environment. The proposed complexity metric integrates dataset attributes such as dimensionality, sparsity, and heterogeneity with factors related to the composition of participating clients. Using federated learning as a representative distributed training setting, we examine how learning difficulty varies across different federated configurations. Experiments on multiple variants of the MNIST dataset and CIFAR dataset show that the proposed metric strongly correlates with federated learning performance and the communication effort required to reach fixed accuracy targets. These findings suggest that complexity estimation can serve as a practical diagnostic tool for resource planning, dataset assessment, and feasibility evaluation in edge-deployed perception systems.

BiasLab: Toward Explainable Political Bias Detection with Dual-Axis Annotations and Rationale Indicators

We present BiasLab, a dataset of 300 political news articles annotated for perceived ideological bias. These articles were selected from a curated 900-document pool covering diverse political events and source biases. Each article is labeled by crowdworkers along two independent scales, assessing sentiment toward the Democratic and Republican parties, and enriched with rationale indicators. The annotation pipeline incorporates targeted worker qualification and was refined through pilot-phase analysis. We quantify inter-annotator agreement, analyze misalignment with source-level outlet bias, and organize the resulting labels into interpretable subsets. Additionally, we simulate annotation using schema-constrained GPT-4o, enabling direct comparison to human labels and revealing mirrored asymmetries, especially in misclassifying subtly right-leaning content. We define two modeling tasks: perception drift prediction and rationale type classification, and report baseline performance to illustrate the challenge of explainable bias detection. BiasLab's rich rationale annotations provide actionable interpretations that facilitate explainable modeling of political bias, supporting the development of transparent, socially aware NLP systems. We release the dataset, annotation schema, and modeling code to encourage research on human-in-the-loop interpretability and the evaluation of explanation effectiveness in real-world settings.