AIMBio-Mat: An AI-Native FAIR Platform for Closed-Loop Materials Discovery and Biomedical Translation

Materials discovery and biomedical translation increasingly require models that can reason across composition, processing, structure, biological response, manufacturability, safety, and governance constraints. Existing materials and biomedical data ecosystems are powerful but remain poorly coupled for AI-guided discovery. Here we present AIMBio, a conceptual framework for an AI-native, FAIR, and governance-aware decision layer that links materials provenance, biomedical context, knowledge graphs, uncertainty-aware machine learning, and human-in-the-loop active learning. The framework formulates biomedical-materials discovery as constrained multi-objective optimization under uncertainty and introduces practical requirements for metadata, model documentation, risk-tiered governance, evaluation metrics, and phased implementation. To make the roadmap testable, we add a minimum viable prototype specification and a worked pilot for AI-guided nanomaterials for drug delivery. AIMBio is positioned as exploratory and preclinical discovery infrastructure, not as clinical decision-support software; any clinical or regulated-device use would require separate validation, change control, and regulatory review. The central contribution is a publishable platform blueprint for converting fragmented materials and biomedical records into auditable, experimentally actionable, and translationally responsible discovery workflows.

AI Powered Image Analysis for Phishing Detection

Phishing websites now rely heavily on visual imitation-copied logos, similar layouts, and matching colours-to avoid detection by text- and URL-based systems. This paper presents a deep learning approach that uses webpage screenshots for image-based phishing detection. Two vision models, ConvNeXt-Tiny and Vision Transformer (ViT-Base), were tested to see how well they handle visually deceptive phishing pages. The framework covers dataset creation, preprocessing, transfer learning with ImageNet weights, and evaluation using different decision thresholds. The results show that ConvNeXt-Tiny performs the best overall, achieving the highest F1-score at the optimised threshold and running more efficiently than ViT-Base. This highlights the strength of convolutional models for visual phishing detection and shows why threshold tuning is important for real-world deployment. As future work, the curated dataset used in this study will be released to support reproducibility and encourage further research in this area. Unlike many existing studies that primarily report accuracy, this work places greater emphasis on threshold-aware evaluation to better reflect real-world deployment conditions. By examining precision, recall, and F1-score across different decision thresholds, the study identifies operating points that balance detection performance and false-alarm control. In addition, the side-by-side comparison of ConvNeXt-Tiny and ViT-Base under the same experimental setup offers practical insights into how convolutional and transformer-based architectures differ in robustness and computational efficiency for visual phishing detection.

Neurosymbolic Reinforcement Learning and Planning: A Survey

The area of Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence (Neurosymbolic AI) is rapidly developing and has become a popular research topic, encompassing sub-fields such as Neurosymbolic Deep Learning (Neurosymbolic DL) and Neurosymbolic Reinforcement Learning (Neurosymbolic RL). Compared to traditional learning methods, Neurosymbolic AI offers significant advantages by simplifying complexity and providing transparency and explainability. Reinforcement Learning(RL), a long-standing Artificial Intelligence(AI) concept that mimics human behavior using rewards and punishment, is a fundamental component of Neurosymbolic RL, a recent integration of the two fields that has yielded promising results. The aim of this paper is to contribute to the emerging field of Neurosymbolic RL by conducting a literature survey. Our evaluation focuses on the three components that constitute Neurosymbolic RL: neural, symbolic, and RL. We categorize works based on the role played by the neural and symbolic parts in RL, into three taxonomies:Learning for Reasoning, Reasoning for Learning and Learning-Reasoning. These categories are further divided into sub-categories based on their applications. Furthermore, we analyze the RL components of each research work, including the state space, action space, policy module, and RL algorithm. Additionally, we identify research opportunities and challenges in various applications within this dynamic field.