Abstract:Mixture of Experts (MoE) architectures have become key to large language models; however, their typical round-robin (RR) scheduling introduces significant bottlenecks. In this paper, we demonstrate that RR causes a previously-undiscovered exponential incast phenomenon with MoE traffic. We propose an alternative proactive fair scheduling framework tailored for MoE workloads, which effectively prevents fabric oversubscription. We also outline how it can be implemented in NICs. Finally, through extensive simulations with real and synthetic workloads, we demonstrate that this framework consistently eliminates incast, maintains a near-100% link utilization, and reduces Collective Completion Time (CCT).
Abstract:The Linear Assignment Problem (LAP) is a fundamental combinatorial optimization task with applications ranging from computer vision to logistics. Classical exact solvers such as the Hungarian and Jonker-Volgenant (LAPJV) algorithms guarantee optimality, but their cubic time complexity $\mathcal{O}(N^{3})$ becomes a bottleneck for large-scale instances. Recent learning-based approaches aim to replace these solvers with neural models, often sacrificing exactness or failing to scale due to memory constraints. We propose a learning-augmented framework that accelerates exact assignment solvers while maintaining optimality and worst-case guarantees. Our method predicts dual variables to warm-start a classical solver, with a fallback that prevents asymptotic runtime degradation when the learned advice is unreliable. We introduce RowDualNet, a lightweight row-independent architecture that avoids the $\mathcal{O}(N^{2})$ memory bottleneck of graph-based models, enabling neural warm-starting at large scale ($N=16{,}384$). Feasibility is ensured via a constructive mechanism based on LP duality (namely, the Min-Trick), eliminating costly iterative projection. Empirically, our approach reduces the search effort of LAPJV and achieves over $2{\times}$ speedups on challenging synthetic distributions, in addition to improving over $1.25{\times}$ and $1.5{\times}$ on real-world tracking (MOT) and transportation (LPT) datasets, respectively, while strictly maintaining full optimality, effectively yielding a robust zero-shot generalization to real-world tasks.