Who Pays for Fairness? Rethinking Recourse under Social Burden

Machine learning based predictions are increasingly used in sensitive decision-making applications that directly affect our lives. This has led to extensive research into ensuring the fairness of classifiers. Beyond just fair classification, emerging legislation now mandates that when a classifier delivers a negative decision, it must also offer actionable steps an individual can take to reverse that outcome. This concept is known as algorithmic recourse. Nevertheless, many researchers have expressed concerns about the fairness guarantees within the recourse process itself. In this work, we provide a holistic theoretical characterization of unfairness in algorithmic recourse, formally linking fairness guarantees in recourse and classification, and highlighting limitations of the standard equal cost paradigm. We then introduce a novel fairness framework based on social burden, along with a practical algorithm (MISOB), broadly applicable under real-world conditions. Empirical results on real-world datasets show that MISOB reduces the social burden across all groups without compromising overall classifier accuracy.

Neuroevolutionary algorithms driven by neuron coverage metrics for semi-supervised classification

In some machine learning applications the availability of labeled instances for supervised classification is limited while unlabeled instances are abundant. Semi-supervised learning algorithms deal with these scenarios and attempt to exploit the information contained in the unlabeled examples. In this paper, we address the question of how to evolve neural networks for semi-supervised problems. We introduce neuroevolutionary approaches that exploit unlabeled instances by using neuron coverage metrics computed on the neural network architecture encoded by each candidate solution. Neuron coverage metrics resemble code coverage metrics used to test software, but are oriented to quantify how the different neural network components are covered by test instances. In our neuroevolutionary approach, we define fitness functions that combine classification accuracy computed on labeled examples and neuron coverage metrics evaluated using unlabeled examples. We assess the impact of these functions on semi-supervised problems with a varying amount of labeled instances. Our results show that the use of neuron coverage metrics helps neuroevolution to become less sensitive to the scarcity of labeled data, and can lead in some cases to a more robust generalization of the learned classifiers.