A study on weakly-supervised training approaches for phoneme-level pronunciation scoring

Phoneme-level computer-assisted pronunciation training systems typically rely on phoneme-level annotations, which are costly and scarce. In this work, we investigate whether phoneme-level mispronunciation information can be learned without phoneme-level supervision by exploiting higher-level pronunciation labels. Specifically, we study a weakly supervised setting in which models are trained using only utterance- or word-level pronunciation labels and analyze whether this supervision induces useful phoneme-level score predictions. We further consider a two-stage training scenario in which a model trained only with utterance-level labels is finetuned using a limited number of carefully-selected phoneme-level labeled utterances. We find that, using our proposed architecture and selection process, the two-stage process leads to comparable results to those obtained with full phoneme-level supervision, requiring only a small fraction of phoneme-level labels.

A Study on the Manifestation of Trust in Speech

Research has shown that trust is an essential aspect of human-computer interaction directly determining the degree to which the person is willing to use a system. An automatic prediction of the level of trust that a user has on a certain system could be used to attempt to correct potential distrust by having the system take relevant actions like, for example, apologizing or explaining its decisions. In this work, we explore the feasibility of automatically detecting the level of trust that a user has on a virtual assistant (VA) based on their speech. We developed a novel protocol for collecting speech data from subjects induced to have different degrees of trust in the skills of a VA. The protocol consists of an interactive session where the subject is asked to respond to a series of factual questions with the help of a virtual assistant. In order to induce subjects to either trust or distrust the VA's skills, they are first informed that the VA was previously rated by other users as being either good or bad; subsequently, the VA answers the subjects' questions consistently to its alleged abilities. All interactions are speech-based, with subjects and VAs communicating verbally, which allows the recording of speech produced under different trust conditions. Using this protocol, we collected a speech corpus in Argentine Spanish. We show clear evidence that the protocol effectively succeeded in influencing subjects into the desired mental state of either trusting or distrusting the agent's skills, and present results of a perceptual study of the degree of trust performed by expert listeners. Finally, we found that the subject's speech can be used to detect which type of VA they were using, which could be considered a proxy for the user's trust toward the VA's abilities, with an accuracy up to 76%, compared to a random baseline of 50%.