Uniform Loss vs. Specialized Optimization: A Comparative Analysis in Multi-Task Learning

Specialized Multi-Task Optimizers (SMTOs) balance task learning in Multi-Task Learning by addressing issues like conflicting gradients and differing gradient norms, which hinder equal-weighted task training. However, recent critiques suggest that equally weighted tasks can achieve competitive results compared to SMTOs, arguing that previous SMTO results were influenced by poor hyperparameter optimization and lack of regularization. In this work, we evaluate these claims through an extensive empirical evaluation of SMTOs, including some of the latest methods, on more complex multi-task problems to clarify this behavior. Our findings indicate that SMTOs perform well compared to uniform loss and that fixed weights can achieve competitive performance compared to SMTOs. Furthermore, we demonstrate why uniform loss perform similarly to SMTOs in some instances. The code will be made publicly available.

Semantic SuperPoint: A Deep Semantic Descriptor

Several SLAM methods benefit from the use of semantic information. Most integrate photometric methods with high-level semantics such as object detection and semantic segmentation. We propose that adding a semantic segmentation decoder in a shared encoder architecture would help the descriptor decoder learn semantic information, improving the feature extractor. This would be a more robust approach than only using high-level semantic information since it would be intrinsically learned in the descriptor and would not depend on the final quality of the semantic prediction. To add this information, we take advantage of multi-task learning methods to improve accuracy and balance the performance of each task. The proposed models are evaluated according to detection and matching metrics on the HPatches dataset. The results show that the Semantic SuperPoint model performs better than the baseline one.