Emergence of Fragility in LLM-based Social Networks: the Case of Moltbook

The rapid diffusion of large language models and the growth in their capability has enabled the emergence of online environments populated by autonomous AI agents that interact through natural language. These platforms provide a novel empirical setting for studying collective dynamics among artificial agents. In this paper we analyze the interaction network of Moltbook, a social platform composed entirely of LLM based agents, using tools from network science. The dataset comprises 39,924 users, 235,572 posts, and 1,540,238 comments collected through web scraping. We construct a directed weighted network in which nodes represent agents and edges represent commenting interactions. Our analysis reveals strongly heterogeneous connectivity patterns characterized by heavy tailed degree and activity distributions. At the mesoscale, the network exhibits a pronounced core periphery organization in which a very small structural core (0.9% of nodes) concentrates a large fraction of connectivity. Robustness experiments show that the network is relatively resilient to random node removal but highly vulnerable to targeted attacks on highly connected nodes, particularly those with high out degree. These findings indicate that the interaction structure of AI agent social systems may develop strong centralization and structural fragility, providing new insights into the collective organization of LLM native social environments.

Semantic Delta: An Interpretable Signal Differentiating Human and LLMs Dialogue

Do LLMs talk like us? This question intrigues a multitude of scholar and it is relevant in many fields, from education to academia. This work presents an interpretable statistical feature for distinguishing human written and LLMs generated dialogue. We introduce a lightweight metric derived from semantic categories distribution. Using the Empath lexical analysis framework, each text is mapped to a set of thematic intensity scores. We define semantic delta as the difference between the two most dominant category intensities within a dialogue, hypothesizing that LLM outputs exhibit stronger thematic concentration than human discourse. To evaluate this hypothesis, conversational data were generated from multiple LLM configurations and compared against heterogeneous human corpora, including scripted dialogue, literary works, and online discussions. A Welch t-test was applied to the resulting distributions of semantic delta values. Results show that AI-generated texts consistently produce higher deltas than human texts, indicating a more rigid topics structure, whereas human dialogue displays a broader and more balanced semantic spread. Rather than replacing existing detection techniques, the proposed zero-shot metric provides a computationally inexpensive complementary signal that can be integrated into ensemble detection systems. These finding also contribute to the broader empirical understanding of LLM behavioural mimicry and suggest that thematic distribution constitutes a quantifiable dimension along which current models fall short of human conversational dynamics.

An LLM-based Delphi Study to Predict GenAI Evolution

Predicting the future trajectory of complex and rapidly evolving systems remains a significant challenge, particularly in domains where data is scarce or unreliable. This study introduces a novel approach to qualitative forecasting by leveraging Large Language Models to conduct Delphi studies. The methodology was applied to explore the future evolution of Generative Artificial Intelligence, revealing insights into key factors such as geopolitical tensions, economic disparities, regulatory frameworks, and ethical considerations. The results highlight how LLM-based Delphi studies can facilitate structured scenario analysis, capturing diverse perspectives while mitigating issues such as respondent fatigue. However, limitations emerge in terms of knowledge cutoffs, inherent biases, and sensitivity to initial conditions. While the approach provides an innovative means for structured foresight, this method could be also considered as a novel form of reasoning. further research is needed to refine its ability to manage heterogeneity, improve reliability, and integrate external data sources.