Inverse Design of Inorganic Compounds with Generative AI

Machine learning is revolutionizing chemistry. Beyond the value of predictive models accelerating virtual screening, generative AI aims at enabling inverse design, reversing the compound-to-property prediction paradigm into property-to-compound generation. Chemists now have access to a rich AI toolbox for organic chemistry, including drug discovery. However, the application of these methods to inorganic compounds remains limited by the challenges posed by their intrinsic nature. This Review analyzes how these challenges have been addressed, considering widely diverse systems ranging from molecules to crystals, including transition metal complexes and microporous materials. The analysis focuses on how generative AI methods have evolved towards data-representation-model pipelines that address the full complexity of inorganic compounds, including their chemical composition, geometry, symmetry, and electronic structure. Future directions, like benchmark standardization and the development of synthesizability metrics, are also discussed.

Perspective: Towards sustainable exploration of chemical spaces with machine learning

Artificial intelligence is transforming molecular and materials science, but its growing computational and data demands raise critical sustainability challenges. In this Perspective, we examine resource considerations across the AI-driven discovery pipeline--from quantum-mechanical (QM) data generation and model training to automated, self-driving research workflows--building on discussions from the ``SusML workshop: Towards sustainable exploration of chemical spaces with machine learning'' held in Dresden, Germany. In this context, the availability of large quantum datasets has enabled rigorous benchmarking and rapid methodological progress, while also incurring substantial energy and infrastructure costs. We highlight emerging strategies to enhance efficiency, including general-purpose machine learning (ML) models, multi-fidelity approaches, model distillation, and active learning. Moreover, incorporating physics-based constraints within hierarchical workflows, where fast ML surrogates are applied broadly and high-accuracy QM methods are used selectively, can further optimize resource use without compromising reliability. Equally important is bridging the gap between idealized computational predictions and real-world conditions by accounting for synthesizability and multi-objective design criteria, which is essential for practical impact. Finally, we argue that sustainable progress will rely on open data and models, reusable workflows, and domain-specific AI systems that maximize scientific value per unit of computation, enabling efficient and responsible discovery of technological materials and therapeutics.