Towards objective and interpretable speech disorder assessment: a comparative analysis of CNN and transformer-based models

Head and Neck Cancers (HNC) significantly impact patients' ability to speak, affecting their quality of life. Commonly used metrics for assessing pathological speech are subjective, prompting the need for automated and unbiased evaluation methods. This study proposes a self-supervised Wav2Vec2-based model for phone classification with HNC patients, to enhance accuracy and improve the discrimination of phonetic features for subsequent interpretability purpose. The impact of pre-training datasets, model size, and fine-tuning datasets and parameters are explored. Evaluation on diverse corpora reveals the effectiveness of the Wav2Vec2 architecture, outperforming a CNN-based approach, used in previous work. Correlation with perceptual measures also affirms the model relevance for impaired speech analysis. This work paves the way for better understanding of pathological speech with interpretable approaches for clinicians, by leveraging complex self-learnt speech representations.

Exploring Pathological Speech Quality Assessment with ASR-Powered Wav2Vec2 in Data-Scarce Context

Automatic speech quality assessment has raised more attention as an alternative or support to traditional perceptual clinical evaluation. However, most research so far only gains good results on simple tasks such as binary classification, largely due to data scarcity. To deal with this challenge, current works tend to segment patients' audio files into many samples to augment the datasets. Nevertheless, this approach has limitations, as it indirectly relates overall audio scores to individual segments. This paper introduces a novel approach where the system learns at the audio level instead of segments despite data scarcity. This paper proposes to use the pre-trained Wav2Vec2 architecture for both SSL, and ASR as feature extractor in speech assessment. Carried out on the HNC dataset, our ASR-driven approach established a new baseline compared with other approaches, obtaining average $MSE=0.73$ and $MSE=1.15$ for the prediction of intelligibility and severity scores respectively, using only 95 training samples. It shows that the ASR based Wav2Vec2 model brings the best results and may indicate a strong correlation between ASR and speech quality assessment. We also measure its ability on variable segment durations and speech content, exploring factors influencing its decision.