Approximate information maximization for bandit games

Entropy maximization and free energy minimization are general physical principles for modeling the dynamics of various physical systems. Notable examples include modeling decision-making within the brain using the free-energy principle, optimizing the accuracy-complexity trade-off when accessing hidden variables with the information bottleneck principle (Tishby et al., 2000), and navigation in random environments using information maximization (Vergassola et al., 2007). Built on this principle, we propose a new class of bandit algorithms that maximize an approximation to the information of a key variable within the system. To this end, we develop an approximated analytical physics-based representation of an entropy to forecast the information gain of each action and greedily choose the one with the largest information gain. This method yields strong performances in classical bandit settings. Motivated by its empirical success, we prove its asymptotic optimality for the two-armed bandit problem with Gaussian rewards. Owing to its ability to encompass the system's properties in a global physical functional, this approach can be efficiently adapted to more complex bandit settings, calling for further investigation of information maximization approaches for multi-armed bandit problems.

Approximate information for efficient exploration-exploitation strategies

This paper addresses the exploration-exploitation dilemma inherent in decision-making, focusing on multi-armed bandit problems. The problems involve an agent deciding whether to exploit current knowledge for immediate gains or explore new avenues for potential long-term rewards. We here introduce a novel algorithm, approximate information maximization (AIM), which employs an analytical approximation of the entropy gradient to choose which arm to pull at each point in time. AIM matches the performance of Infomax and Thompson sampling while also offering enhanced computational speed, determinism, and tractability. Empirical evaluation of AIM indicates its compliance with the Lai-Robbins asymptotic bound and demonstrates its robustness for a range of priors. Its expression is tunable, which allows for specific optimization in various settings.