Contribution à l'Optimisation d'un Comportement Collectif pour un Groupe de Robots Autonomes

This thesis studies the domain of collective robotics, and more particularly the optimization problems of multirobot systems in the context of exploration, path planning and coordination. It includes two contributions. The first one is the use of the Butterfly Optimization Algorithm (BOA) to solve the Unknown Area Exploration problem with energy constraints in dynamic environments. This algorithm was never used for solving robotics problems before, as far as we know. We proposed a new version of this algorithm called xBOA based on the crossover operator to improve the diversity of the candidate solutions and speed up the convergence of the algorithm. The second contribution is the development of a new simulation framework for benchmarking dynamic incremental problems in robotics such as exploration tasks. The framework is made in such a manner to be generic to quickly compare different metaheuristics with minimum modifications, and to adapt easily to single and multi-robot scenarios. Also, it provides researchers with tools to automate their experiments and generate visuals, which will allow them to focus on more important tasks such as modeling new algorithms. We conducted a series of experiments that showed promising results and allowed us to validate our approach and model.

Unknown area exploration for robots with energy constraints using a modified Butterfly Optimization Algorithm

Butterfly Optimization Algorithm (BOA) is a recent metaheuristic that has been used in several optimization problems. In this paper, we propose a new version of the algorithm (xBOA) based on the crossover operator and compare its results to the original BOA and 3 other variants recently introduced in the literature. We also proposed a framework for solving the unknown area exploration problem with energy constraints using metaheuristics in both single- and multi-robot scenarios. This framework allowed us to benchmark the performances of different metaheuristics for the robotics exploration problem. We conducted several experiments to validate this framework and used it to compare the effectiveness of xBOA with wellknown metaheuristics used in the literature through 5 evaluation criteria. Although BOA and xBOA are not optimal in all these criteria, we found that BOA can be a good alternative to many metaheuristics in terms of the exploration time, while xBOA is more robust to local optima; has better fitness convergence; and achieves better exploration rates than the original BOA and its other variants.