COvolve: Adversarial Co-Evolution of Large-Language-Model-Generated Policies and Environments via Two-Player Zero-Sum Game

A central challenge in building continually improving agents is that training environments are typically static or manually constructed. This restricts continual learning and generalization beyond the training distribution. We address this with COvolve, a co-evolutionary framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate both environments and agent policies, expressed as executable Python code. We model the interaction between environment and policy designers as a two-player zero-sum game, ensuring adversarial co-evolution in which environments expose policy weaknesses and policies adapt in response. This process induces an automated curriculum in which environments and policies co-evolve toward increasing complexity. To guarantee robustness and prevent forgetting as the curriculum progresses, we compute the mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium (MSNE) of the zero-sum game, thereby yielding a meta-policy. This MSNE meta-policy ensures that the agent does not forget to solve previously seen environments while learning to solve previously unseen ones. Experiments in urban driving, symbolic maze-solving, and geometric navigation showcase that COvolve produces progressively more complex environments. Our results demonstrate the potential of LLM-driven co-evolution to achieve open-ended learning without predefined task distributions or manual intervention.

Evolutionary Discovery of Reinforcement Learning Algorithms via Large Language Models

Reinforcement learning algorithms are defined by their learning update rules, which are typically hand-designed and fixed. We present an evolutionary framework for discovering reinforcement learning algorithms by searching directly over executable update rules that implement complete training procedures. The approach builds on REvolve, an evolutionary system that uses large language models as generative variation operators, and extends it from reward-function discovery to algorithm discovery. To promote the emergence of nonstandard learning rules, the search excludes canonical mechanisms such as actor--critic structures, temporal-difference losses, and value bootstrapping. Because reinforcement learning algorithms are highly sensitive to internal scalar parameters, we introduce a post-evolution refinement stage in which a large language model proposes feasible hyperparameter ranges for each evolved update rule. Evaluated end-to-end by full training runs on multiple Gymnasium benchmarks, the discovered algorithms achieve competitive performance relative to established baselines, including SAC, PPO, DQN, and A2C.

Interactive Double Deep Q-network: Integrating Human Interventions and Evaluative Predictions in Reinforcement Learning of Autonomous Driving

Integrating human expertise with machine learning is crucial for applications demanding high accuracy and safety, such as autonomous driving. This study introduces Interactive Double Deep Q-network (iDDQN), a Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) approach that enhances Reinforcement Learning (RL) by merging human insights directly into the RL training process, improving model performance. Our proposed iDDQN method modifies the Q-value update equation to integrate human and agent actions, establishing a collaborative approach for policy development. Additionally, we present an offline evaluative framework that simulates the agent's trajectory as if no human intervention had occurred, to assess the effectiveness of human interventions. Empirical results in simulated autonomous driving scenarios demonstrate that iDDQN outperforms established approaches, including Behavioral Cloning (BC), HG-DAgger, Deep Q-Learning from Demonstrations (DQfD), and vanilla DRL in leveraging human expertise for improving performance and adaptability.

REvolve: Reward Evolution with Large Language Models for Autonomous Driving

Designing effective reward functions is crucial to training reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. However, this design is non-trivial, even for domain experts, due to the subjective nature of certain tasks that are hard to quantify explicitly. In recent works, large language models (LLMs) have been used for reward generation from natural language task descriptions, leveraging their extensive instruction tuning and commonsense understanding of human behavior. In this work, we hypothesize that LLMs, guided by human feedback, can be used to formulate human-aligned reward functions. Specifically, we study this in the challenging setting of autonomous driving (AD), wherein notions of "good" driving are tacit and hard to quantify. To this end, we introduce REvolve, an evolutionary framework that uses LLMs for reward design in AD. REvolve creates and refines reward functions by utilizing human feedback to guide the evolution process, effectively translating implicit human knowledge into explicit reward functions for training (deep) RL agents. We demonstrate that agents trained on REvolve-designed rewards align closely with human driving standards, thereby outperforming other state-of-the-art baselines.