Reliable and Reproducible Demographic Inference for Fairness in Face Analysis

Fairness evaluation in face analysis systems (FAS) typically depends on automatic demographic attribute inference (DAI), which itself relies on predefined demographic segmentation. However, the validity of fairness auditing hinges on the reliability of the DAI process. We begin by providing a theoretical motivation for this dependency, showing that improved DAI reliability leads to less biased and lower-variance estimates of FAS fairness. To address this, we propose a fully reproducible DAI pipeline that replaces conventional end-to-end training with a modular transfer learning approach. Our design integrates pretrained face recognition encoders with non-linear classification heads. We audit this pipeline across three dimensions: accuracy, fairness, and a newly introduced notion of robustness, defined via intra-identity consistency. The proposed robustness metric is applicable to any demographic segmentation scheme. We benchmark the pipeline on gender and ethnicity inference across multiple datasets and training setups. Our results show that the proposed method outperforms strong baselines, particularly on ethnicity, which is the more challenging attribute. To promote transparency and reproducibility, we will publicly release the training dataset metadata, full codebase, pretrained models, and evaluation toolkit. This work contributes a reliable foundation for demographic inference in fairness auditing.

Fairer Analysis and Demographically Balanced Face Generation for Fairer Face Verification

Face recognition and verification are two computer vision tasks whose performances have advanced with the introduction of deep representations. However, ethical, legal, and technical challenges due to the sensitive nature of face data and biases in real-world training datasets hinder their development. Generative AI addresses privacy by creating fictitious identities, but fairness problems remain. Using the existing DCFace SOTA framework, we introduce a new controlled generation pipeline that improves fairness. Through classical fairness metrics and a proposed in-depth statistical analysis based on logit models and ANOVA, we show that our generation pipeline improves fairness more than other bias mitigation approaches while slightly improving raw performance.

Quantifying User Coherence: A Unified Framework for Cross-Domain Recommendation Analysis

The effectiveness of Recommender Systems (RS) is closely tied to the quality and distinctiveness of user profiles, yet despite many advancements in raw performance, the sensitivity of RS to user profile quality remains under-researched. This paper introduces novel information-theoretic measures for understanding recommender systems: a "surprise" measure quantifying users' deviations from popular choices, and a "conditional surprise" measure capturing user interaction coherence. We evaluate 7 recommendation algorithms across 9 datasets, revealing the relationships between our measures and standard performance metrics. Using a rigorous statistical framework, our analysis quantifies how much user profile density and information measures impact algorithm performance across domains. By segmenting users based on these measures, we achieve improved performance with reduced data and show that simpler algorithms can match complex ones for low-coherence users. Additionally, we employ our measures to analyze how well different recommendation algorithms maintain the coherence and diversity of user preferences in their predictions, providing insights into algorithm behavior. This work advances the theoretical understanding of user behavior and practical heuristics for personalized recommendation systems, promoting more efficient and adaptive architectures.