Mitosis Detection in the Wild: Multi-Tumor and Context-Aware Generalization in the MIDOG 2025 Challenge

Automated mitosis detection is a well-established task in computational pathology. While previous benchmarks focused on scanner-induced domain shift, clinical "real-world" application requires models to be robust across the vast variance to be expected in the histological landscape. The MItosis DOmain Generalization (MIDOG) 2025 challenge was designed to evaluate algorithmic performance across unprecedented biological and contextual diversity. We curated a test dataset of 365 cases, encompassing 12 distinct human, canine and feline tumor types, digitized across multiple scanning platforms. Moving beyond hand-selected hotspots, the challenge required detection also in random tissue areas (representative of the whole slide detection situation) and challenging areas (areas rich in hard negatives). In the second track, we introduced the classification of atypical mitotic figures (AMFs). There were 18 teams submitting to the detection track, with F1 scores ranging up to 0.740. In the AMF detection track, we had 21 submissions with balanced accuracy values up to 0.908. Our analysis reveals that while most models perform reliably in traditional hotspots, significant performance degradation occurs in challenging ROIs, where false positive rates tripled. Furthermore, performance varied significantly across the 12 tumor types, highlighting "blind spots" in current state-of-the-art architectures when encountering rare or highly pleomorphic malignancies. Moreover, we evaluated the effectiveness of ensembling and found a mean increases of 1.5 and 1.3 percentage points in F1 score and balanced accuracy, respectively. In contrast, TTA showed no relevant improvement. MIDOG 2025 demonstrates that "in the wild" mitosis detection remains a significant hurdle. The transition from hotspot-only evaluation to a multi-contextual framework provides a more realistic proxy for clinical reliability.

MATTERIX: toward a digital twin for robotics-assisted chemistry laboratory automation

Accelerated materials discovery is critical for addressing global challenges. However, developing new laboratory workflows relies heavily on real-world experimental trials, and this can hinder scalability because of the need for numerous physical make-and-test iterations. Here we present MATTERIX, a multiscale, graphics processing unit-accelerated robotic simulation framework designed to create high-fidelity digital twins of chemistry laboratories, thus accelerating workflow development. This multiscale digital twin simulates robotic physical manipulation, powder and liquid dynamics, device functionalities, heat transfer and basic chemical reaction kinetics. This is enabled by integrating realistic physics simulation and photorealistic rendering with a modular graphics processing unit-accelerated semantics engine, which models logical states and continuous behaviors to simulate chemistry workflows across different levels of abstraction. MATTERIX streamlines the creation of digital twin environments through open-source asset libraries and interfaces, while enabling flexible workflow design via hierarchical plan definition and a modular skill library that incorporates learning-based methods. Our approach demonstrates sim-to-real transfer in robotic chemistry setups, reducing reliance on costly real-world experiments and enabling the testing of hypothetical automated workflows in silico. The project website is available at https://accelerationconsortium.github.io/Matterix/ .

FLIP: Flowability-Informed Powder Weighing

Autonomous manipulation of powders remains a significant challenge for robotic automation in scientific laboratories. The inherent variability and complex physical interactions of powders in flow, coupled with variability in laboratory conditions necessitates adaptive automation. This work introduces FLIP, a flowability-informed powder weighing framework designed to enhance robotic policy learning for granular material handling. Our key contribution lies in using material flowability, quantified by the angle of repose, to optimise physics-based simulations through Bayesian inference. This yields material-specific simulation environments capable of generating accurate training data, which reflects diverse powder behaviours, for training "robot chemists". Building on this, FLIP integrates quantified flowability into a curriculum learning strategy, fostering efficient acquisition of robust robotic policies by gradually introducing more challenging, less flowable powders. We validate the efficacy of our method on a robotic powder weighing task under real-world laboratory conditions. Experimental results show that FLIP with a curriculum strategy achieves a low dispensing error of 2.12 +/- 1.53 mg, outperforming methods that do not leverage flowability data, such as domain randomisation (6.11 +/- 3.92 mg). These results demonstrate FLIP's improved ability to generalise to previously unseen, more cohesive powders and to new target masses.