Bayesian Latent Space Models for Graphs Are Misspecified: Toward Robust Inference via Generalized Posteriors

Bayesian latent space models offer a principled approach to network representation, but rely on correct specification of both geometry and link function. Real-world networks often violate these assumptions, exhibiting geometric mismatch and structural anomalies that break standard metric properties. We show that such misspecification pushes the data-generating distribution outside the model class, causing Bayesian inference to become overconfident and poorly calibrated. To address this, we propose a generalized posterior framework for random geometric graphs. We introduce Link-Sequential R-SafeBayes, a method that exploits dyadic conditional independence to estimate prequential risk and adaptively tune posterior regularization. Experiments on synthetic and real-world networks demonstrate improved calibration, better link prediction performance, and a reliable criterion for selecting latent geometries across Euclidean, spherical, and hyperbolic spaces.

Aligning the Unseen in Attributed Graphs: Interplay between Graph Geometry and Node Attributes Manifold

The standard approach to representation learning on attributed graphs -- i.e., simultaneously reconstructing node attributes and graph structure -- is geometrically flawed, as it merges two potentially incompatible metric spaces. This forces a destructive alignment that erodes information about the graph's underlying generative process. To recover this lost signal, we introduce a custom variational autoencoder that separates manifold learning from structural alignment. By quantifying the metric distortion needed to map the attribute manifold onto the graph's Heat Kernel, we transform geometric conflict into an interpretable structural descriptor. Experiments show our method uncovers connectivity patterns and anomalies undetectable by conventional approaches, proving both their theoretical inadequacy and practical limitations.