When Denoising Hinders: Revisiting Zero-Shot ASR with SAM-Audio and Whisper

Recent advances in automatic speech recognition (ASR) and speech enhancement have led to a widespread assumption that improving perceptual audio quality should directly benefit recognition accuracy. In this work, we rigorously examine whether this assumption holds for modern zero-shot ASR systems. We present a systematic empirical study on the impact of Segment Anything Model Audio by Meta AI, a recent foundation-scale speech enhancement model proposed by Meta, when used as a preprocessing step for zero-shot transcription with Whisper. Experiments are conducted across multiple Whisper model variants and two linguistically distinct noisy speech datasets: a real-world Bengali YouTube corpus and a publicly available English noisy dataset. Contrary to common intuition, our results show that SAM-Audio preprocessing consistently degrades ASR performance, increasing both Word Error Rate (WER) and Character Error Rate (CER) compared to raw noisy speech, despite substantial improvements in signal-level quality. Objective Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio analysis on the English dataset confirms that SAM-Audio produces acoustically cleaner signals, yet this improvement fails to translate into recognition gains. Therefore, we conducted a detailed utterance-level analysis to understand this counterintuitive result. We found that the recognition degradation is a systematic issue affecting the majority of the audio, not just isolated outliers, and that the errors worsen as the Whisper model size increases. These findings expose a fundamental mismatch: audio that is perceptually cleaner to human listeners is not necessarily robust for machine recognition. This highlights the risk of blindly applying state-of-the-art denoising as a preprocessing step in zero-shot ASR pipelines.

BengaliSent140: A Large-Scale Bengali Binary Sentiment Dataset for Hate and Non-Hate Speech Classification

Sentiment analysis for the Bengali language has attracted increasing research interest in recent years. However, progress remains constrained by the scarcity of large-scale and diverse annotated datasets. Although several Bengali sentiment and hate speech datasets are publicly available, most are limited in size or confined to a single domain, such as social media comments. Consequently, these resources are often insufficient for training modern deep learning based models, which require large volumes of heterogeneous data to learn robust and generalizable representations. In this work, we introduce BengaliSent140, a large-scale Bengali binary sentiment dataset constructed by consolidating seven existing Bengali text datasets into a unified corpus. To ensure consistency across sources, heterogeneous annotation schemes are systematically harmonized into a binary sentiment formulation with two classes: Not Hate (0) and Hate (1). The resulting dataset comprises 139,792 unique text samples, including 68,548 hate and 71,244 not-hate instances, yielding a relatively balanced class distribution. By integrating data from multiple sources and domains, BengaliSent140 offers broader linguistic and contextual coverage than existing Bengali sentiment datasets and provides a strong foundation for training and benchmarking deep learning models. Baseline experimental results are also reported to demonstrate the practical usability of the dataset. The dataset is publicly available at https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/akifislam/bengalisent140/

Towards a Humanized Social-Media Ecosystem: AI-Augmented HCI Design Patterns for Safety, Agency & Well-Being

Social platforms connect billions of people, yet their engagement-first algorithms often work on users rather than with them, amplifying stress, misinformation, and a loss of control. We propose Human-Layer AI (HL-AI)--user-owned, explainable intermediaries that sit in the browser between platform logic and the interface. HL-AI gives people practical, moment-to-moment control without requiring platform cooperation. We contribute a working Chrome/Edge prototype implementing five representative pattern frameworks--Context-Aware Post Rewriter, Post Integrity Meter, Granular Feed Curator, Micro-Withdrawal Agent, and Recovery Mode--alongside a unifying mathematical formulation balancing user utility, autonomy costs, and risk thresholds. Evaluation spans technical accuracy, usability, and behavioral outcomes. The result is a suite of humane controls that help users rewrite before harm, read with integrity cues, tune feeds with intention, pause compulsive loops, and seek shelter during harassment, all while preserving agency through explanations and override options. This prototype offers a practical path to retrofit today's feeds with safety, agency, and well-being, inviting rigorous cross-cultural user evaluation.