Amortized Inference for Sampling Distributions Where the Bootstrap Fails

Efron's bootstrap is the default tool for estimating the sampling distribution of a statistic, yet it is provably inconsistent for maxima of bounded-support distributions, means under infinite variance, extreme quantiles, and tail-index estimators. The classical remedies, the m-out-of-n bootstrap and subsampling, require rate corrections that depend on unknown parameters and behave erratically at realistic sample sizes. We propose an amortized alternative: a neural network is trained on simulated datasets drawn from a prior over a distribution family, using single independent draws of the root T_n - T(F) scored by the pinball loss, a proper scoring rule whose population minimizer is the posterior-predictive law of the root. At test time, a single forward pass maps one dataset of n = 200 observations to its full sampling-distribution estimate, from which confidence intervals follow directly. On four canonical bootstrap-failure problems (bounded-support maximum, alpha-stable mean, Pareto tail index, and 99% value-at-risk under tempered stable returns), the method attains nominal 95% coverage, beats every feasible classical method in Wasserstein distance to the true sampling distribution, and captures over 97% of the achievable improvement where the exact Bayes-optimal answer is computable. For the value-at-risk problem no distribution-free method can reach nominal coverage at all; the learned method attains 94.7%. A single universal network with a statistic token matches all four specialists, and on real daily market returns the unchanged model averages 0.87 coverage against 0.73 for the bootstrap, as predicted by our out-of-family analysis.

Privacy-Aware Collaborative and Distributed Bayesian Optimization

We propose a collaborative meta-learning framework for distributed Bayesian optimization matching centralized performance without raw-data exchange. We show gradient sharing leaks client observations, with leakage worsening as the search converges and queries concentrate near the optimum. We evaluate a differentially private defense and characterize its privacy-utility trade-off.

Memory, Roughness, and Information Persistence in Financial Markets: A Structural Approach to Volatility Forecasting

This paper studies the joint role of long-memory dynamics,rough-volatility behavior, and persistence-based forecasting features in equity volatility modeling. We combine semiparametric long-memory estimation, rough-volatility diagnostics, and structured forecasting regressions to examine whether persistence measures contain economically meaningful forecasting information beyond conventional volatility predictors. Using a panel of 115 S&P500 constituents from November 2001 through April 2026, we document that volatility proxies exhibit substantial long-memory behavior and locally rough dynamics. The cross-sectional mean Geweke-Porter-Hudak estimate of the memory parameter is $\hat{d} = 0.226$, while the corresponding local-Whittle estimate is $\hat{d} = 0.440$, with statistical significance observed across nearly the entire panel. Rolling estimates of persistence rise substantially during the global financial crisis and the COVID period and display a positive contemporaneous association with the VIX. We then examine whether persistence-related features improve out-of-sample volatility forecasts beyond standard HAR and HAR-X benchmarks. Incorporating cross-sectional persistence aggregates, sectoral persistence measures, and persistence-by-stress interaction terms produces moderate but statistically significant forecasting improvements, particularly at longer horizons and during stress regimes. Forecast gains are strongest during periods of elevated market volatility and in volatility-managed portfolio applications. The results suggest that persistence measures may serve as useful reduced-form indicators of the duration and propagation of uncertainty in financial markets, although the paper does not claim structural identification of the economic mechanisms generating persistence.

Interpretable Hypothesis-Driven Trading:A Rigorous Walk-Forward Validation Framework for Market Microstructure Signals

We develop a rigorous walk-forward validation framework for algorithmic trading designed to mitigate overfitting and lookahead bias. Our methodology combines interpretable hypothesis-driven signal generation with reinforcement learning and strict out-of-sample testing. The framework enforces strict information set discipline, employs rolling window validation across 34 independent test periods, maintains complete interpretability through natural language hypothesis explanations, and incorporates realistic transaction costs and position constraints. Validating five market microstructure patterns across 100 US equities from 2015 to 2024, the system yields modest annualized returns (0.55%, Sharpe ratio 0.33) with exceptional downside protection (maximum drawdown -2.76%) and market-neutral characteristics (beta = 0.058). Performance exhibits strong regime dependence, generating positive returns during high-volatility periods (0.60% quarterly, 2020-2024) while underperforming in stable markets (-0.16%, 2015-2019). We report statistically insignificant aggregate results (p-value 0.34) to demonstrate a reproducible, honest validation protocol that prioritizes interpretability and extends naturally to advanced hypothesis generators, including large language models. The key empirical finding reveals that daily OHLCV-based microstructure signals require elevated information arrival and trading activity to function effectively. The framework provides complete mathematical specifications and open-source implementation, establishing a template for rigorous trading system evaluation that addresses the reproducibility crisis in quantitative finance research. For researchers, practitioners, and regulators, this work demonstrates that interpretable algorithmic trading strategies can be rigorously validated without sacrificing transparency or regulatory compliance.