Improving Ad-hoc Search Effectiveness for Conversational Information Retrieval via Model Merging

Conversational information retrieval is challenging since it requires the consideration of the conversation history which potentially gives rise to topic shifts and coreference resolution across previous turns. To address these challenges, previous work mainly rely on traditional fine-tuning of ad-hoc retrievers on conversational datasets or extrapolates their generalizability through multi-tasking. However, this mainstream approach is costly - since it requires model re-training - and exhibits catastrophic forgetting, where the model loses its foundational ad-hoc retrieval performance. In this paper, we fill this gap by introducing model merging as a training-free strategy enabling the design of a single retrieval model that operates across both ad-hoc and conversational settings with no additional fine-tuning. We conduct experiments using linear and non-linear parameter-wise merging strategies - namely Model Soup and Slerp - on standard ad-hoc search and conversational retrieval datasets. Our results demonstrate that model merging significantly enhances the ad-hoc search capabilities of conversational retrievers while improving generalizability across task-specific datasets, achieving up to 15% higher NDCG@3 under zero-shot conditions.

RAC: Retrieval-Augmented Clarification for Faithful Conversational Search

Clarification questions help conversational search systems resolve ambiguous or underspecified user queries. While prior work has focused on fluency and alignment with user intent, especially through facet extraction, much less attention has been paid to grounding clarifications in the underlying corpus. Without such grounding, systems risk asking questions that cannot be answered from the available documents. We introduce RAC (Retrieval-Augmented Clarification), a framework for generating corpus-faithful clarification questions. After comparing several indexing strategies for retrieval, we fine-tune a large language model to make optimal use of research context and to encourage the generation of evidence-based question. We then apply contrastive preference optimization to favor questions supported by retrieved passages over ungrounded alternatives. Evaluated on four benchmarks, RAC demonstrate significant improvements over baselines. In addition to LLM-as-Judge assessments, we introduce novel metrics derived from NLI and data-to-text to assess how well questions are anchored in the context, and we demonstrate that our approach consistently enhances faithfulness.