Beyond pass@1: A Reliability Science Framework for Long-Horizon LLM Agents

Existing benchmarks measure capability -- whether a model succeeds on a single attempt -- but production deployments require reliability -- consistent success across repeated attempts on tasks of varying duration. We show these properties diverge systematically as task duration grows, and that pass@1 on short tasks is structurally blind to this divergence. We introduce a reliability science framework for long-horizon LLM agents with four metrics: Reliability Decay Curve (RDC), Variance Amplification Factor (VAF), Graceful Degradation Score (GDS), and Meltdown Onset Point (MOP). We evaluate 10 models across 23,392 episodes on a 396-task benchmark spanning four duration buckets and three domains. Key findings: (1) reliability decay is domain-stratified -- SE GDS drops from 0.90 to 0.44 while document processing is nearly flat (0.74 to 0.71); (2) VAF bifurcates by capability tier -- high VAF is a capability signature, not an instability signal; (3) capability and reliability rankings diverge substantially, with multi-rank inversions at long horizons; (4) frontier models have the highest meltdown rates (up to 19%) because they attempt ambitious multi-step strategies that sometimes spiral; and (5) memory scaffolds universally hurt long-horizon performance across all 10 models. These results motivate reliability as a first-class evaluation dimension alongside capability.

Severe Domain Shift in Skeleton-Based Action Recognition:A Study of Uncertainty Failure in Real-World Gym Environments

The practical deployment gap -- transitioning from controlled multi-view 3D skeleton capture to unconstrained monocular 2D pose estimation -- introduces a compound domain shift whose safety implications remain critically underexplored. We present a systematic study of this severe domain shift using a novel Gym2D dataset (style/viewpoint shift) and the UCF101 dataset (semantic shift). Our Skeleton Transformer achieves 63.2% cross-subject accuracy on NTU-120 but drops to 1.6% under zero-shot transfer to the Gym domain and 1.16% on UCF101. Critically, we demonstrate that high Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) detection AUROC does not guarantee safe selective classification. Standard uncertainty methods fail to detect this performance drop: the model remains confidently incorrect with 99.6% risk even at 50% coverage across both OOD datasets. While energy-based scoring (AUROC >= 0.91) and Mahalanobis distance provide reliable distributional detection signals, such high AUROC scores coexist with poor risk-coverage behavior when making decisions. A lightweight finetuned gating mechanism restores calibration and enables graceful abstention, substantially reducing the rate of confident wrong predictions. Our work challenges standard deployment assumptions, providing a principled safety analysis of both semantic and geometric skeleton recognition deployment.