As large language models (LLMs) become more advanced and impactful, it is increasingly important to scrutinize the data that they rely upon and produce. What is it to be a dataset practitioner doing this work? We approach this in two parts: first, we define the role of "dataset practitioner" by performing a retrospective analysis on the responsibilities of teams contributing to LLM development at Google. Then, we conduct semi-structured interviews with a cross-section of these practitioners (N=10). We find that data quality is the top priority. To evaluate data quality, practitioners either rely on their own intuition or write custom evaluation logic. There is a lack of consensus across practitioners on what quality is and how to evaluate it. We discuss potential reasons for this phenomenon and opportunities for alignment.