Evolutionary neural architecture search (ENAS) employs evolutionary algorithms to find high-performing neural architectures automatically, and has achieved great success. However, compared to the empirical success, its rigorous theoretical analysis has yet to be touched. This work goes preliminary steps toward the mathematical runtime analysis of ENAS. In particular, we define a binary classification problem UNIFORM, and formulate an explicit fitness function to represent the relationship between neural architecture and classification accuracy. Furthermore, we consider (1+1)-ENAS algorithm with mutation to optimize the neural architecture, and obtain the following runtime bounds: 1) the one-bit mutation finds the optimum in an expected runtime of $O(n)$ and $\Omega(\log n)$; 2) the multi-bit mutation finds the optimum in an expected runtime of $\Theta(n)$. These theoretical results show that one-bit and multi-bit mutations achieve nearly the same performance on UNIFORM. We provide insight into the choices of mutation in the ENAS community: although multi-bit mutation can change the step size to prevent a local trap, this may not always improve runtime. Empirical results also verify the equivalence of these two mutation operators. This work begins the runtime analysis of ENAS, laying the foundation for further theoretical studies to guide the design of ENAS.